Originally posted by texandrews ... and I actually wonder if any of us as humans actually see the same scene the same way. So, in asking this question I'm sort of trying to unleash the ants at a picnic.....
One of the differences I've noticed is that different viewers 'auto white balance' in their heads to different degrees.
Photographers that are used to dealing with white balance are the most picky, where as casual observers may or may not see or care if colours wander around a bit, even when it's pointed out to them.
It's when there is a familiar colour in the shot it's tougher; things like accent colours at weddings, a favourite car, or someones skin tones. Those should be 'right' - and by that I mean that when printed and held up to the original object under similar lighting should look identical to most folks.
But is my red the same as yours?
Turns out that retinas can be removed and compared (preferably post-mortem
), and the same frequencies of light excite the chemistry the same, given 'normal' subjects.
For those with some degree of color blindness... not so much.