Originally posted by CreationBear if you take it as a given that you're giving away some DR over digital, are there any landscape applications that are hard to pull off even with a properly exposed slide/negative?
Well, you pretty much nailed the concern for color slide film and to a lesser extent with color negative film. Current generation digital will provide greater dynamic range, though with somewhat different behavior as the limits are approached. B&W on the other hand still has the tonality and dynamic range edge over digital. The hitch there is that attention must be given to exposure and processing.
Short list of things that are hard to pull off from an exposure point of view (all are a challenge regardless of which medium)
- Detail at zone XI and above
- Detail at zone I and II
- Full detail in a scene spanning zones I through X
- Color fidelity (digital often fails with saturated red and yellow, film with color temperature mismatch)
- Subtle tone gradations (digital has trouble in the low value areas simply because the data are discrete, color film has problems due to the nature of the process)
- Subtlety of tone in harsh light
Added (submitted accidentally before finished):
In the realm of very-difficult-bordering-on-impossible is doing composites with film. There is a time-honored tradition with that kind of work with sandwiched negatives, but getting similar or better results is so much easier with digital. Another area of difficulty is long time exposures. In this realm, film shines, despite loss of reciprocity (response to light is not linear as exposures lengthen). A half-hour night exposure presents no particular difficulty. With digital, the demons of noise are always making life miserable.
Steve