Originally posted by surfar
from Imaging Resource, they seem to think the Fuji image(left)is a bit better than 645z(right)
Which is why I said
"any glaring superiority over the competition".
Look around and the comparator images and the Pentax does better on the cloth swatches and the Fiddler bottle.
The Scale rule on the right, are about the same.
Notice that the black bristle brush in that same area, the Pentax picked up a bit more details, however, notice that the reflection is also different which does mean that the lighting setup has been changed and makes it less "1:1" as we'd think (since the light direction will influence how much contrast brushes over the objects, creating apparent detail)
The Fuji gets better edges and the mosaic bottle.
So like I said, win here loose there, it just does not show that Fuji got any more out of the sensor than anyone else (no only Pentax)
Furthermore, these are OOC JPGs and a 63mm lens vs a 50mm lens, if we want to be picky, though in a 'real world' context, I'm able to accept the differences.