Originally posted by johnha Does the A35 have better IQ than the FA35 (accepting sample variation)? When I researched the FA35 v 33-55 they both seemed to have field curvature issues so I went for the versatility of the zoom. I had always assumed the A35 and FA35 had the same formula?
Something is different, because the A suffers less from field curvature, which was the main issue with the FA35. I didn't have it long enough to check it thoroughly---the main work I do requires deep DOF, so most of the problems were masked by that. Rick Denney on these forums has done some home user testing, so you should search for those examples. I found a DFA 35 at a great price and snagged it. No issues there.
Quote: I found it difficult to get reviews of the 33-55 on 33x44 sensors (most related to film). Edge sharpness on the D is OK for me if stopped down, I don't normally inspect the corners too much.
Very true
Quote: Ideally the 28-45 is clearly a better choice, but its well over my budget. If the A35 is better than the FA, I might consider picking one up.
Keep looking for the 28-45----I just got one from the marketplace here at a great price. The real issue with that lens is size and weight---it is a beast. Otherwise it's very, very useful.