Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-03-2020, 01:42 PM   #1
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 527
Recommendations for Mail Processing Ektachrome 220

I've spent a rather unsuccessful hour trying to find a mail company on-line (US) to process some of my old 220 Etachrome film. Anyone know a good lab that doesn't charge an arm and a leg?

07-03-2020, 01:58 PM - 1 Like   #2
amateur dirt farmer
Loyal Site Supporter
pepperberry farm's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: probably out in a field somewhere...
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 41,659
I always recommend Dwayne's Photo, in Parsons Kansas....

they are reopening on July 6th, but do not know what services they will be offering:

Dwayne?s Photo – A trusted name in photo processing for over 60 years.
07-03-2020, 02:08 PM   #3
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2017
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,138
I have used Photosmith, in Dover NH, for film development and scanning. I don't know if they do Ektachrome.
07-03-2020, 02:46 PM   #4
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
There are a couple of places near me that have a good reputation, what is the going rate for arms and legs?

Blue Moon Camera | Film Processing

Citizen's Photo | Film Processing

Citizens does accept and return by mail, but a phone call might be needed to work out payment. I am not sure what they use now for a processor, but they used to have a Refrema dip and dunk setup...very cool.


Steve


Last edited by stevebrot; 07-08-2020 at 10:57 AM.
07-03-2020, 04:31 PM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
gofour3's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 8,090
+ 1 for Dwayne's.

Phil.
07-03-2020, 04:59 PM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: midwest, United States
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,714
Dwayne's was the last lab in the US, and possibly the world to develop Kodachrome. Compared to Kodachrome, Ektachrome is child's play to process.

Thanks,
barondla
07-03-2020, 07:04 PM   #7
Veteran Member
Silent Street's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Castlemaine, Victoria, AUS
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,151
QuoteOriginally posted by barondla Quote
Dwayne's was the last lab in the US, and possibly the world to develop Kodachrome. Compared to Kodachrome, Ektachrome is child's play to process.
Not quite historically correct. Lighthouse Labs here in Australia, in Sydney processed Kodachrome for about 2 years after its demise, with a huge amount of research, experimentation, trial and error. It then also offered custom roll-by-roll processing of PKL long after processing ceased, with a cost of AUD$250 (!) per 35mm roll. Unsurprisingly, despite the legions of over-excited carnival barkers salivating over the prospect of the Kodachrome snaps being processed (finally!), there were only 2 takers, and the results were not up there with the original PKL processing quality. The message is rather for people still holding out for the proverbial Resurrection Day! But that's how difficult PKL is to process, as it is, under the skin, a B&W film with colour couplers added in processing. That bit was not so very straightforward!

Meanwhile, Ektachrome can be easily processed in a 3-bath home processing kit, one of which recently announced allows the novelty of changing the colour palette (aka profile) during the processing; this was on PetaPixel (?) somewhere recently.

07-07-2020, 03:22 PM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,272
The problem is that 220 is not done by many labs anymore. AgX Imaging in Michigan does it and does a great job. It is E6 only and I believe that Ektachrome is E6?
07-08-2020, 06:26 AM   #9
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: NoVA
Posts: 635
Yes, Ektachrome is the very progenitor of the E-series processing chemistry.

Rick “who started while in college with E-4, processing 220 and making proofs for a rodeo photographer” Denney
07-08-2020, 11:05 AM   #10
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by desertscape Quote
and I believe that Ektachrome is E6?
For recent product, yes. If shooting expired (say, pre-1996), a lab that offers E4 might be needed. For a history of Ektachrome processing, see...

Ektachrome - Wikipedia


Steve
07-08-2020, 04:03 PM   #11
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Ed Hurst's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,657
I am pretty sure that Ektachrome went over to E6 processing long before 1996. The E4 process stopped being mainstream in the late 70s (I think) and was only maintained for a couple of specialist applications (if I remember rightly, an infrared film and maybe one other obscure purpose) and due to some legal or contractual obligation on Kodak to keep offering it. Essentially, any Ektachrome film you are likely to have (i.e. anything newer than the late 70s) is almost certain to need E6 processing.

Please correct me if I'm wrong - this is just what I recall :-)
07-08-2020, 04:50 PM   #12
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: NoVA
Posts: 635
1978, but not universally. Consumer Ektachrome was a little later.

Rick “Ejtacgrome was the standard for process-color publication photos” Denney
07-08-2020, 05:03 PM   #13
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Ed Hurst's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,657
Thanks, Rick. But presumably LONG before 1996, any Ektachrome film sold was E6, right?
07-08-2020, 05:17 PM   #14
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Ed Hurst Quote
I am pretty sure that Ektachrome went over to E6 processing long before 1996.
You are correct. E6 films became broadly available in 1977, though some E4 emulsions remained in production until the mid-1990s. Wikipedia lists Kodak PCF (photomicrography) and Kodak IE (color infra-red) as the hold-overs. I don't know that any lab is able to do E4.


Steve
07-08-2020, 05:25 PM   #15
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Ed Hurst's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,657
So, on that basis, unless you happen to have an Ektachrome film dating back a looooooooooooooong way, you can pretty much assume it's E6.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
645d, 645z, camera, ektachrome, film, formats, mail, medium format, recommendations for mail, rolls, velvia, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ektachrome is back! timw4mail Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 205 08-23-2020 08:53 AM
Ektachrome in Beta Testing Kiwi645hauler Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 20 11-16-2019 03:55 AM
It would seem the new Ektachrome is getting closer to release boriscleto General Photography 7 08-11-2018 12:28 PM
Post-Processing Post Processing Challenge #220 - Unicorn Wannabe Dartmoor Dave Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories 16 05-17-2017 05:06 AM
Tip: Using USPS Express Mail versus Priority Mail for International Shipments pentaman General Talk 5 03-11-2012 06:07 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:51 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top