Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-25-2020, 03:10 PM - 1 Like   #16
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Pål Jensen's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norway
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,997
QuoteOriginally posted by KiloHotelphoto Quote
I think they definitely need to come out with a professional service program also to help compete, I believe they used to offer a service for 645Z not sure if they still do or not but I’ve heard Fuji has a decent program in the US at least. Buyers spending that kind of money want reassurance if they have a problem they will get quick service or a loaner.
Not necessary. Pentax makes field cameras. They did that in the film days as well. Never targeted the commercial or studio shooter.....

An FF 645 does make sense. It will increase the distance to the K-mount FF system offer more return in terms of image quality for the significant extra money.
A full frame 645 camera will be more expensive due to the extra sensor cost, but developing costs and manufacturing cost should be about the same as for an FF 645 body. Cropped lenses will probably not get significantly cheaper than FF 645 lenses as it is not glass cost that push MF lens prices upwards, but the fact that they are made in relatively small quantities.


Last edited by Pål Jensen; 12-25-2020 at 03:21 PM.
12-25-2020, 07:08 PM   #17
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central Coast, CA
Posts: 1,020
I think image stabilization would be a great addition. My thought is that it probably would use a ton of power which would require a now battery or a camera that uses two batteries.
12-25-2020, 08:24 PM   #18
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: midwest, United States
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,338
Original Poster
Find it interesting that there isn't sufficient roi too to go ff, and yet the competitor has built 3 new digital mf bodies and 9 lenses in 3 years. So their accountants are nuts? Hard to believe. They survived the transition from film to digital.

The money isn't with the pros. It's the amateur. So the new body would be over $10K. Didn't stop the Z. I don't buy the "dumping old lenses" theory. It doesn't explain the release of the 2nd 25mm, 28-45 and 90 macro. The 645 could end up like the Q, but I don't believe it will. Ricoh admitted they were having a tough time figuring out how to make a Q that could repel the phone onslaught. Ricoh never said they see no where for mf to shine.

Pixel shift, composition adjust, and astrotracing may be more useful to us than ff. But, they aren't more useful to Pentax. Pentax and Olympus have pushed these technologies. Where has it gotten them? They are very special use features that only work sometimes. A large sensor always works.

The competitor has already brought out SR and Pixel shift in their flagship. Some don't like their Pixel Shift implementation. Doesn't matter, they ticked the feature box. They could add Pentax's method to their camera at any time (unless Pentax has it patented). Once there's a moving sensor, Astrotracer, composition adjust, and other things can be added. If the competitor feels they are worthwhile they will be added. Pentax's advantages could evaporate at any time. There was a time only Pentax and Minolta had sensor stabilization. Now everyone has it.

If Pentax isn't willing or able to match Fuji's investment they will have to compete in a different arena. Move to a smaller pond.

Even the 645Z's landscape cred is in jeopardy. A camera with the same basic image quality and half the weight is very enticing to hikers. Pentax needs ff to balance the comparison.

Thanks,
barondla
12-25-2020, 10:12 PM - 1 Like   #19
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
KiloHotelphoto's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Glen Mills, PA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 867
I think Ricoh have already given up in the medium format segment, they just wont announce it. Or they truly believe that mirrorless will not be popular and and most of those Fuji shooters will comeback to a medium format dslr.

I'm not sure astrotracer is a big deal, you can get mounts that can do a much better job than you can do with just moving the sensor a little bit. Pixel shift is fine for something like product photography when nothing is moving but that is it.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
645d, 645z, camera, canon, competitor, equipment, ff, lens, lenses, medium format, pentax, pros, sensor
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why did you go full frame? camera_nut Pentax Full Frame 283 1 Day Ago 10:10 AM
Some questions about buying sony full frame + adapters + pentax full frame lens jhlxxx Pentax Full Frame 8 06-14-2017 05:13 PM
From Full-Frame Sony... to Pentax... to Full-Frame Canon Mr_Canuck Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 42 01-21-2014 12:50 AM
Full frame or no full frame.... Deedee Pentax K-3 & K-3 II 14 10-08-2013 05:39 AM
Full Frame Full Frame vanchaz2002 Pentax DSLR Discussion 30 12-11-2008 07:09 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top