Originally posted by tuco I won't argue with that. But look through this tread, note when the first 645D pictures started to appear and compare color to your film pictures. I don't think you will find color like them for better or worse.
I actually thought today to give this a test and go to the crazy place off the highway where this great and colorful "stuff" lived...all of it for sale.
And, apparently, so was everything and it's all gone and bulldozers were working the area......
Film could look GREAT...but, the system itself of gathering the images, with a locked in ISO, film type and having to change the film back after, at most, in the case of the 645 system, 30 exposures, not to mention possible chemicals or having to send the film out, then scan it...all waiting days or weeks for turnaround...all to get some elusive "film look"...is it worth it?
I will look over my color MF film stuff (working to put all of it in Lightroom so this will be good chance to review) and see if there is any matches or close matches to today that could be "captured" (i luv that term...as if...what , exactly was "captured"?)....if so...a reshoot will commence...
---------- Post added 07-03-21 at 04:31 PM ----------
Originally posted by RICHARD L. Taken with a K3 and a lowly DA 18-135 mm zoom lens @ 78 mm FL and f/11. The 645 wouldn't have given me the same DOF, though.
....wats next....its a shame my 645 wasn't around so i used my 6 year old cellphone?
perhaps this should be posted in the K-3 forum, yes?