Originally posted by acoufap I think people who compose their pictures consciously in place tend to do it according the native view finder aspect ratio mostly given by the sensor size. That’s simply the natural way. It’s much harder to imagine in place to go another aspect ratio cause you always have to think about which parts to omit in post.
In my opinion the given aspect ratio not always is the most fitting for every picture you want to make. Often you may realize in post that there are other very interesting crop / aspect ratio options and although the one you chose in place may be very good you could prefer another in post.
I’d say the sensor size and its aspect ratio is nothing else than a technical restriction. The picture and its impression counts - independently from the native aspect ratio of the camera sensor. Using cropping in post doesn't generally mean that a bad job was done in place of the capture IMO - sometimes I read posts that could imply this.
It’s nice if camera and its viewfinder support the idea of flexibility by offering different crop frames with darkening the outside and storing the image as a raw file.
Agree with every word. I come from a painting background where there are no fixed aspect ratios, except those imposed by the artist or the architecture. Thus, I have always found the sometimes heated discussions among photographers about aspect ratios, in-camera framing, etc., to be quaint, at best.
---------- Post added 04-18-16 at 08:36 AM ----------
Originally posted by unkipunki A few handheld shots from over the weekend with the Z the DFA 90mm and FA 150mm
Great light in #2 and 3, well presented.