Originally posted by guidoanselmi dont mean to give unwanted crit, you should have put in a blue or yellow/red filter to bring out some contrast (depending how you want to tone what i guess).
Assuming that was meant for me, I appreciate the suggestion, and I've noted that a different filter might have helped another shot I posted on another thread shot on a different film. I was not thrilled with this film, Ilford XP2, as it was processed. This was one of only a couple of shots that I liked from the day. One either likes this photo for what it is or not, because I doubt that filters would have changed much in this particular instance. This film was flat, flat, flat.
The scene with the jogger consisted of various levels of tan/brown plus the jogger in blue-gray tights and dark blue top. A yellow filter might have darkened her tights a bit, and might have darkened the very small amount of sky visible. I think blue might have been counterproductive. With a chromogenic B&W film like XP2 and the brown desert winter colors of the scene, any effect that filters might have imparted would be very subtle and difficult to judge in advance. The original photo does convey the feeling of the scene. On the other hand, it might have also been nicer in color.
This being the digital age, we do have other tools for changing local contrast (for purely educational purposes), and creating a slightly different look.
Original: