Originally posted by ivanvernon Great shot. Ed, I am wondering about your overall impressions of the 67/300/4 on the 645Z. I have it and the 67/200/4 as well, and have generally found the 200 much sharper. Your photo looks very good, however, and that's why I would appreciate your overview comment on the lens, Thanks, ivan
Thanks squire!
I think it depends on whether you mean the 300 f4 or the 300 f4 EDIF. The former lens I have never owned, but believe it to be only competent. The EDIF version, though, is a stunningly good lens. One of the best lenses of any length I have used on any system. Certainly eclipses the 200 f4 for quality.
Which version do you have?
---------- Post added 04-26-19 at 08:49 PM ----------
Just to provide some perspective on London's ever-expanding skyline, this picture shows a current scene. The second tall building from the left (now called Tower 42, formerly the NatWest Tower) was the building the eclipsed the BT Tower for size, being 600ft tall. The Gherkin (to the left of the shot) is newer and nearly as tall at 590 ft. The building rapidly sprouting behind it (22 Bishopgate) it dwarfs them all, at 912 ft. The Shard (not shown in this scene, but in the St. Paul's shots I posted recently) is even taller at 1,016ft. All very impressive, but certainly not the London I grew up visiting...
645Z with 6x7 300mm f4 EDIF
[IMG]
[/IMG]