:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

Mike Cash · 03-18-2009, 10:00 AM

Originally posted by Pumalite

I'm 85 years old. For all I know; he used My picture to do his book

Profile says you're 28.

I suppose it is safe to assume you also falsely misrepresented the other two photos in that post as being your own. Anybody who could take a shot as good as that second one wouldn't lower himself to engage in the chicanery involved in the first one, which to me is sufficient argument that you stole that one as well.

artobest · 03-18-2009, 10:38 AM

Originally posted by Pumalite

I've been wondering about Pumalite. This shot seems to show a dot screen. It's certainly not a scan of a photographic print. Lost the original, Pumalite?

Javier, I respectfully disagree with you. This is not a small matter that should be quietly shoved under the carpet. We're talking about alleged theft, and, by association, a shadow cast on all our efforts here on the forum. If Pumalite is John Shaw, let him come forward. If he isn't, he should be banned from the forum and his images removed.

Pumalite · 03-18-2009, 11:06 AM

Well; I'm 85. I know who I am, what I do and what I've done. You do whatever you want with your beliefs.

jgredline · 03-18-2009, 11:17 AM

Originally posted by artobest

I've been wondering about Pumalite. This shot seems to show a dot screen. It's certainly not a scan of a photographic print. Lost the original, Pumalite?

Javier, I respectfully disagree with you. This is not a small matter that should be quietly shoved under the carpet. We're talking about alleged theft, and, by association, a shadow cast on all our efforts here on the forum. If Pumalite is John Shaw, let him come forward. If he isn't, he should be banned from the forum and his images removed.

No that's fine and I am NOT condoning any sort of fraud or theft...What I am saying is that the person who brought up this charge and the person in question should have a mod sort it out. (Three people)...In no way am I defending Puma, I am trying to keep this ''wonderful'' thread civil....

jgredline · 03-18-2009, 11:20 AM

Puma.
Rather than assume anything, let me ask...
Did you make those photographs in question?

Nesster · 03-18-2009, 11:21 AM

Originally posted by lithos

Reala 100 - damn fine film - at ISO 64. Tweaked in Photoshop, converted to BW in Silver Efex Pro.

Damn fine 'print' too you made there. Photoshop really has cut both the learning curve and the time drain of darkroom work. While there are still some tactile things better done by hand in the darkroom, computerized image processing for me is a larger advance than digital photography.

Pumalite · 03-18-2009, 11:46 AM

If you doubt it; what can I say?

jgredline · 03-18-2009, 11:48 AM

Originally posted by Pumalite

If you doubt it; what can I say?

You can say yes or no.

jgredline · 03-18-2009, 11:50 AM

Originally posted by zplus

First some hp5 400 print scans:

Number 3 and 6 are excellent!. I love the grain. That number 6 in particular is very good.

jgredline · 03-18-2009, 11:54 AM

removed offensive family snaps

Pumalite · 03-18-2009, 11:59 AM

Of course yes.

kevinschoenmakers · 03-18-2009, 12:00 PM

That last one is adorable, him with his head all tucked in, holding a camera usually for people way beyond his age. The pointing really adds alot too, your eye follows the trail, sees the boy pointing and wanders off to the right. It 'works' very well.
Shame about the blown-out sky, but I guess there's not much you could've done about that.

ftpaddict · 03-18-2009, 12:10 PM

Regarding the stolen (or not) doo-dad, maybe they both took a picture of the same thing, but not at the same time?

Nesster · 03-18-2009, 12:30 PM

Originally posted by jake.astig

From my Canon 7 with 50mm F1.2 lens and Agfa APX 400 film souped in PaRodinal

That combo looks good and greasy

Nesster · 03-18-2009, 12:40 PM

For a tiny change of pace, MF folding camera pics - these are all pre-war, uncoated lenses. The Franka Solida and the Certo Super Sport Dolly have pretty lousy lenses, but the Bessa 66 has a decent Skopar.

Franka (kodak plus-x)

03-18-2009, 11:54 AM	#145
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	removed offensive family snaps Last edited by jgredline; 03-19-2009 at 08:29 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

03-18-2009, 10:00 AM	#136
Mike Cash Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Japan Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,950	Originally posted by Pumalite I'm 85 years old. For all I know; he used My picture to do his book Profile says you're 28. I suppose it is safe to assume you also falsely misrepresented the other two photos in that post as being your own. Anybody who could take a shot as good as that second one wouldn't lower himself to engage in the chicanery involved in the first one, which to me is sufficient argument that you stole that one as well.

03-18-2009, 10:38 AM	#137
artobest Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Swansea, Wales Posts: 455	Originally posted by Pumalite I've been wondering about Pumalite. This shot seems to show a dot screen. It's certainly not a scan of a photographic print. Lost the original, Pumalite? Javier, I respectfully disagree with you. This is not a small matter that should be quietly shoved under the carpet. We're talking about alleged theft, and, by association, a shadow cast on all our efforts here on the forum. If Pumalite is John Shaw, let him come forward. If he isn't, he should be banned from the forum and his images removed.

03-18-2009, 11:06 AM	#138
Pumalite Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 80	Well; I'm 85. I know who I am, what I do and what I've done. You do whatever you want with your beliefs.

03-18-2009, 11:17 AM	#139
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by artobest I've been wondering about Pumalite. This shot seems to show a dot screen. It's certainly not a scan of a photographic print. Lost the original, Pumalite? Javier, I respectfully disagree with you. This is not a small matter that should be quietly shoved under the carpet. We're talking about alleged theft, and, by association, a shadow cast on all our efforts here on the forum. If Pumalite is John Shaw, let him come forward. If he isn't, he should be banned from the forum and his images removed. No that's fine and I am NOT condoning any sort of fraud or theft...What I am saying is that the person who brought up this charge and the person in question should have a mod sort it out. (Three people)...In no way am I defending Puma, I am trying to keep this ''wonderful'' thread civil....

03-18-2009, 11:20 AM	#140
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Puma. Rather than assume anything, let me ask... Did you make those photographs in question?

03-18-2009, 11:21 AM	#141
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	Originally posted by lithos Reala 100 - damn fine film - at ISO 64. Tweaked in Photoshop, converted to BW in Silver Efex Pro. Damn fine 'print' too you made there. Photoshop really has cut both the learning curve and the time drain of darkroom work. While there are still some tactile things better done by hand in the darkroom, computerized image processing for me is a larger advance than digital photography.

03-18-2009, 11:46 AM	#142
Pumalite Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 80	If you doubt it; what can I say?

03-18-2009, 11:48 AM	#143
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by Pumalite If you doubt it; what can I say? You can say yes or no.

03-18-2009, 11:50 AM	#144
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by zplus First some hp5 400 print scans: Number 3 and 6 are excellent!. I love the grain. That number 6 in particular is very good.

03-18-2009, 11:59 AM	#146
Pumalite Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 80	Of course yes.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

03-18-2009, 12:00 PM	#147
kevinschoenmakers Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Shanghai Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,509	That last one is adorable, him with his head all tucked in, holding a camera usually for people way beyond his age. The pointing really adds alot too, your eye follows the trail, sees the boy pointing and wanders off to the right. It 'works' very well. Shame about the blown-out sky, but I guess there's not much you could've done about that.

03-18-2009, 12:10 PM	#148
ftpaddict Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Yurp Photos: Gallery Posts: 4,666	Regarding the stolen (or not) doo-dad, maybe they both took a picture of the same thing, but not at the same time?

03-18-2009, 12:30 PM	#149
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	Originally posted by jake.astig From my Canon 7 with 50mm F1.2 lens and Agfa APX 400 film souped in PaRodinal That combo looks good and greasy

03-18-2009, 12:40 PM	#150
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	For a tiny change of pace, MF folding camera pics - these are all pre-war, uncoated lenses. The Franka Solida and the Certo Super Sport Dolly have pretty lousy lenses, but the Bessa 66 has a decent Skopar. Franka (kodak plus-x)