Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
37 Likes  
A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY: Development of the solenoid in Pentax cameras
Posted By: photogem, 06-27-2019, 01:50 AM

A little bit of history about the development of the solenoid in Pentax cameras up to the K-70:

The legendary patent named "Automatic Camera Shutter" was applied for July 30, 1968 and granted Jan. 4th, 1972.

You can down load the patent HERE


1. The first very simple solenoid I have found in the Pentax ME and ME-Super.


No permanent magnet yet but only a plunger and an electro-magnet to induce the magnetic force to pull the plunger:



It was in 1983 that Pentax introduced its first SLR which offered fully automatic exposure ("program") mode when coupled with a matching Pentax-A series lens:
The Pentax Super-A (Super Program), followed by the Program Plus (Program-A) in 1984.



This was the first time solenoids where used the way we know it until today up to the Pentax K-70.

2. A very nicely built and sophisticated solenoid:





Not yet a rare-earth-magnet as later used but an alnico-magnet, i.e. an alloy mainly of al-uminium, ni-ckel, co-balt, invented by T.Mishima 1931 in Japan:


Backside:


The solenoid in action:





The force of this alnico magnet pulled a kind of cap connected to the leaver which moved the aperture-mechanism and kept it in place.
Taking a picture, the two coils acting as an electro-magnet receive 3 Volts DC from the cameras battery ( 2 x 1,5V SR44 or 1 x 3-V CR1108).
Those 2 coils cancelled the magnetic force of the permanent magnet and the top-cap opened, the leaver moved. Impedance was 14,3 ohms.


The electro-magnetic coils:


The partnumber given was G-100:


This partnumber G-100 remained the same at least up to the Pentax K20D and K200D, possibly later on as well but I have not yet seen a service manual of those.
Samsung named it G-100 as well in the GX1, GX2, GX10 and GX20.


The next solenoid as we know it was introduced in some the MZ-Series (MZ50, MZ6, MZ7 and a few others up to the analoge *ist). It looks identical to those used in the later DSLR bodies and had almost the same impedance. But its holding-force and body thickness was slightly different. Some which I and others had found had opposite polarity as well but others applied it with success in DSLR bodies, so it looks like that there were different versions used. Another type of solenoid was used as well for example in the Pentax MZ5/n. But Pentax didn't keep it up later on. This solenoid was driven with 6VDC (rated with 4,5VDC) by the solenoid-driver, impuls was 6.45V.

3. Here a photo showing the 3.rd version of a solenoid, this one I took from a MZ50 tested in a K30:

One can see, the plunger tilts slightly in relation to the round part of the leaver which it moves.



The next drawing shows this early SLR solenoid (i.e. not yet DSLR!):


It has 3.4mm bobbin-size (versus 4mm bobbin-size for the later DSLR-solenoids). It looks almost similar to the DSLR solenoids but aside of a tiny differenz in bobbin-size it has a slightly different holding force and often me and others have found polarisation to be opposite to the later introduced DSLR solenoid.

Data Japan-made "SLR" solenoid:
- Operating Voltage DC: 3 - 6V
- Coilresistance: 30 ohms
- Attraction force: 2,2 N min
- Backtension: 0,8 N
- Operating stroke: 2mm


4. A very different solenoid was used in many other MZ/ZX such as the MZ5 bodies:





4. With the introduction of the Pentax *ist D came the made in Japan white DSLR solenoid which never failed in any of those bodies up to the Pentax K-r:


The manufacturer of those solenoids was Shinmei, Japan... also manufacturing similar solenoids for ALPS and Matsushita.


The next drawing shows that this new introduced Japan solenoid for DSLR bodies had now 4mm bobbin-size instead of 3.4mm:


As mentioned, this difference of 0.6mm is hardly noticable but this is why aside from another small difference in holding-force and often opposite polarisation the early SLR solenoids with 3.4mm bobbin-size sit slightly bent when installed into a DSLR body! This new DSLR-solenoid made in Japan (also for ALPS) It had a live-timespan of remarkable 100.000 actuations!


Data Japan-made "DSLR" Solenoid:
- Operating Voltage DC: 3,6 - 7,2 V- Coilresistance: 30 ohms
- Attraction force: 2,5 N min
- Backtension: 1,0 N
- Operating stroke: 2mm


When Shinmei moved production to China, difficulties started!

The material of the body changed to green colourand instead of using PTFE (teflon) it was now made out of PET. The alloy of the plunger changed as well.
PTFE (teflon) is a very good bearing material, it is used as well for bearings in turntables. This bearing was patented by W. Firebough. He describes the bearing very well in This interview. I could verify the amazing bearing qualities myself. When one inspects a heavy used Japan-solenoid closer against one made in China, one can tell the difference, PET is worn off much quicker.

This China made solenoid was first tried in the flash circuit of the Pentax K100D, K100D, K200D, K-m, K-x and K-r but as far as I know mainly in those delivered to Europe.
Rated voltage was now 3,7 - 7.5V (impuls 8.32V) but live-time was drastically lower: 20.000 actuations.


Data China-made solenoid
- Operating Voltage DC: 3,7 - 7,5V
- Coilresistance: 30 ohms
- Attraction force: 2,8 - 3,0 N min
- Backtension: 1,2 N
- Operating stroke: 2mm


Here you can see the measurements on a Pentax K-30


The next drawing shows the datasheet of the green China-solenoid:

The dashed (----) line shows the 30ohms version used for Pentax. The lower live-time of 20.000 actuations is due to PET instead of PTFE used in the early Japansolenoid.

Some claim (without prove, because it cannot be proven) that the voltage used for the Chinasolenoid would be more in the region of 2.5V because it releases smoothly at 2.5V. That's a lot of nonsense because none, the early Japan made SLR, the next Japan made DSLR solenoid nor the China made version work well with just 2,5V/DC! They do work with 3V but are driven with 6V in the SLR Pentax cameras and 7.2V in the DSLR Pentax cameras.
If one studies the curve for holding-force one can see this very clearly! I have done tests with 3V, 6V and 7.2 Volts. Measuring release-time (and thus holding-force) can be done from 5V - 9V. If one compares different solenoids it just is important that the applied voltage is the same for all solenoids one compares! The applied Vpp since the Pentax *ist-D is exactly 8.32VDC. Earlier pre DSLR bodies such as the MZ50 had 6VppDC. The solenoid is driven by a transistor (BJT/SOT23) and protected by a simple diode, which some mistake for a resistor or chip-resistor. This diode looks almost identical to an SMD-resistor, and yes, it resists into one direction (infinite ohms) but not into the other (zero ohms)
Nevertheless, it is a good idea to resist such chips were you don't want them or were they just don't belong to.

Some repairshops quote that they exchanged a chip-resistor but following the circuit very closely I just could not find any. It wouldn't make sense either, because if one studies the curve and quick response the solenoid has to actuate, any resistor would basically block any quick response. The solenoid does depend mainly on "surge-power", i.e. milli-amperes delivered quickly and not on voltage. If one studies the curve, one can quickly find out, that there is a range which is best for minimum holding-force. I challenge anybody who insists on some chip-resistor to prove it to me. I am curious for the outcome. And should I be wrong, I will happily "throw my hat" on the ground and apologize!


While the China-made solenoid was tested in the flash-circuit, the solenoid used for aperture-control remained still the white made in Japan unit!
This test-period went on for about 6 years (the K100D was introduced 2006, the K-30 introduced 6 years later in 2012).
So 6 years without trouble, enough time to use it for the aperture control.

This photo shows the green China solenoid for the pop-up-flash in a K200D:



And here built out:



But this change turned out to be the beginning of difficulties, due to several reasons described here as well:

The plunger of this solenoid often remained closed/stuck! The diaphragm/blades/aperture of the lens could not open and this led what is now often called ABF = "Aperture-Block-Failure", "dark-image-syndrom", "dark-exposure-problems" etc.

For quite a long time it was not yet clear that the cultprit was just the solenoid! The complete "diaphragm-control-block" was exchanged or possibly just the whole camera because exchange of the block was very work + time intensive. But then due to all the research mainly here in this forum (!) Ricoh/Pentax realized that it was just the solenoid itself. It was about Dec. 2015 that Ricoh started to modify the solenoid. The made in Japan solenoid was no longer available, machines were already since a long time in China, the plants in Japan closed, so no chance to go back to this Japan-made solenoid!


Some early KS-1's, K-S2's and many K-50's as well of course K-500's still used the earlier China-made green solenoid and thus some of them failed and still do fail.

It is mainly due to fact that the metal body + plunger of the China-Solenoid is made out of relatively higher coercivity material, i.e. it retains its magnetism after the field strength is removed!


This explains why in many cases ABF happens more to those Pentax bodies which hadn't been used for a longer period and/or those with a low shuttercount (a low shuttercount implies little use anyway up to the case of two NOS Pentax bodies which I repaired, they hadn't been used at all but cought ABF, so the best proof for this explanation which I got from a forum-member who is a Chartered Electrical Engineer with Nuclear Electric.

It is very simple: When the Pentax is not used the plunger sits all the time near the permanent magnet and the magnetized body.
No use will enhance the "glueing effect", i.e. the solenoid sticking inside the body.
Regular use is no guarantee but it is clear and researched that ABF happens less often.

Combined use of the AA-Adapter with rechargeable AA-batteries (best are Eneloops) + regular use has proven as the best way to avoid ABF.

I know of (very few) cases were this is the case. Usually high-shuttercount + ABF indicates non-use for some time.
But not always, I have encountered cases, were ABF just happened the next day.



But good enough: As far as I can tell the green solenoid now used in the Pentax K-70 is superior to the early version!
And yet: The holding force is still stronger, it does not fire as quick as the white made in Japan-Solenoid!

Close-up photos of the solenoid used in the K-70 show a very nicely machined plunger with a very smooth surface:



Very different to the surface of a solenoid modified by filing or sanding:

The surface of the alloy which is hurt by sanding or filing starts to corrode and can actually rust pretty bad.

Beware of those green China-Solenoids now being sold on ebay, aliexpress and other sources,
those are even inferior and were NOT MADE FOR DSLR but for Lenovo DVD-drives:



You can see, the 2 pins facing sideways are missing! They have again a way too strong holding force, also because they have a longer and thus stronger permanent magnet!
They were constructed for a very simple "press-button-open-tray" circuit

Further Warnings: (based on long-time and verified studies)

- Lubing: Beware of any attempt to lube the plunger of the solenoid!
Even very thougthful attemps or rubbing graphite-powder into the plunger didn't solve it.
WORST Scenario I ever came across was to spray contact-cleaner or similar stuff from HERE, i.e. the mirror-box towards the region of the solenoid. You don't want to spray anything inside your camera, most sprays contain oily ingredients such as naphta or petroleum together with fast evaporating ingredients to make it dry quickly. The worst that can happen is if such stuff comes into contact with the mirror or hinged submirror, damping material for the mirror, the shuttercurtain of your sensor.

- Beware also of blue-coloured China-Solenoids from ROM-Drives:
Wrong impedance (15ohms)! Danger of exodus for the "solenoid-driver".

- Again: Beware of green solenoids which are filed/sanded!
Further information why you should avoid this you can study HERE

- Beware using white Japan-made SLR solenoids from some MZ/ZX SLR-bodies!
Recently I did a vice-versa test by inserting the China-made green solenoids into a MZ50, MZ7 and MZ30.
They didn't work at all!

Some companies offer modifications "in weight, structure and/or surface", sounds impressive, but if you study such a modified solenoid:
They are just filed, which of course alters weight, structure and surface!


With the Pentax K7 Pentax introduced a stepper-motor instead of a solenoid. This demands a different powersupply, more current from the battery, extra space within the body, i.e. the body has to be larger plus some weight. This stepper-motor was used in the K7, K5, K3, KP and K1.

Size comparison of the stepper motor on its board against the solenoid:



GOOD NEWS (for the latest green China-solenoid used now in the K-70 and for repair:

I don't know when Ricoh demanded of their manufacturer another very good modification.


They changed the size of the magnet, it is shorter and thus has less magnetic power:



So we have 3 steps of the China-made green solenoid used since the K-30 in the aperture block:


1. The non-modified version as we know it was used until Dec. 2012, less clear defined dimple in the plunger

2. The 1.st Modification as used since Dec. 2012 with a smaller magnet, changed alloy and clear defined dimple in the plunger

3. The 2.nd Modification: Same alloy as in the 1.st modification but even shorter magnet.



And as can clearly be seen: The solenoid on the Lenovo (fake Pentax) solenoid on the right has a larger magnet
Worse than Version-1, i.e. the original non-modified China-solenoid.






Last edited by photogem; 04-14-2022 at 12:30 AM. Reason: Latest info added by Photogem
Views: 26,746
10-17-2021, 12:11 PM   #76
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 10,660
I'm probably missing something, but I have a Pentax ES ll that I bought new in '74 and it has an automatic shutter, program, etc...and there was a forerunner of the ES lll, the ES which came out in the very early '70's with an automatic shutter. The were both screw mounts.

I don't know enough about electronics to know if they had solenoids. Maybe not.

I'm no expert, so perhaps I've misunderstood, but I still have my ES ll and it still works on 'automatic,

10-18-2021, 12:08 AM   #77
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
photogem's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,484
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by lesmore49 Quote
I'm probably missing something, but I have a Pentax ES ll that I bought new in '74 and it has an automatic shutter, program, etc...and there was a forerunner of the ES lll, the ES which came out in the very early '70's with an automatic shutter. The were both screw mounts.

I don't know enough about electronics to know if they had solenoids. Maybe not.

I'm no expert, so perhaps I've misunderstood, but I still have my ES ll and it still works on 'automatic,
AUTO on a Takumar lens has nothing to do with the A-setting of lenses that were introduced with the SMC-A lenses and automatic or semi-automatic (Av, Tv, Tav etc.) modes which is "triggered" by the solenoid.

The AUTO-setting on a Takumar and the later Super-Takumars is well explained HERE

So no, the ESII has no solenoid.

Recently somebody mixed up the AUTO-Setting on the Mode-dial with the AUTO/M-Switch on the Takumars.
Attached Images
 
10-18-2021, 08:23 AM   #78
retired sw engineer
Loyal Site Supporter
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 21,223
QuoteOriginally posted by lesmore49 Quote
I'm probably missing something, but I have a Pentax ES ll that I bought new in '74 and it has an automatic shutter, program, etc...and there was a forerunner of the ES lll, the ES which came out in the very early '70's with an automatic shutter. The were both screw mounts.

I don't know enough about electronics to know if they had solenoids. Maybe not.

I'm no expert, so perhaps I've misunderstood, but I still have my ES ll and it still works on 'automatic,
Your “ES II” is excluded from ‘abf’ effects in any case - just as my “Super Program” of ten years later is excluded - because they used Japanese-made solenoids, and ‘abt’ occurs only with the change of materials and possible workmanship changes that occurred when production later moved to China.
10-18-2021, 11:42 PM   #79
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
photogem's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,484
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
Your “ES II” is excluded from ‘abf’ effects in any case - just as my “Super Program” of ten years later is excluded - because they used Japanese-made solenoids, and ‘abt’ occurs only with the change of materials and possible workmanship changes that occurred when production later moved to China.
This is wrong and you know that, so I ask myself, what is the reason for your post?!

As I have clearly showed in the main article, the "Super-Program" (Super-A) and then the "Program Plus (Program-A) were the first Pentax using a solenoid
relativly similar in construction to the later SLR and particular DSLR solenoids:

But it is still very different to the Japan-made "DLSR-solenoid" with a moving plunger and not a moving magnetic-cap:

That type of solenoid with a moving plunger and the magnet in the top holding the plunger in position was first intruduced in 1997 with the MZ50.



THE ESII DOES NOT USE ANY SOLENOID!

I made that very clear in my previous message!

So I don't understand:

Why Do you write something that you know isn't true?
You have done so in the past:
Solenoid in Pentax K-70 - Page 4 - PentaxForums.com
Here I made it very clear to you but you still seem to have this urge to write something that by now you know isn't true:
New K-70 and Aperture Block - Page 5 - PentaxForums.com
Why?

May I remind you of that very sensible advice:
QuoteOriginally posted by caliscouser Quote
Enough already reh321: This thread is already 49 pages long.
Ask yourself before posting:
Are you adding new information, data, insights to the discussion?
Of course you don't add any new information, not even old information but wrong information!
As you had been corrected about this error several times: Is there any intention behind that?
How can it be brought over to you finally?


Also:
Why do you invent some new word called "abt" when since a long time we speak about Aperture-Block-Failure = ABF?

The main article is clear enough, every information is right there.


Last edited by photogem; 10-20-2021 at 05:49 AM.
10-30-2021, 12:44 PM   #80
retired sw engineer
Loyal Site Supporter
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 21,223
QuoteOriginally posted by photogem Quote
This is wrong and you know that, so I ask myself, what is the reason for your post?!

As I have clearly showed in the main article, the "Super-Program" (Super-A) and then the "Program Plus (Program-A) were the first Pentax using a solenoid
relativly similar in construction to the later SLR and particular DSLR solenoids:

But it is still very different to the Japan-made "DLSR-solenoid" with a moving plunger and not a moving magnetic-cap:

That type of solenoid with a moving plunger and the magnet in the top holding the plunger in position was first intruduced in 1997 with the MZ50.



THE ESII DOES NOT USE ANY SOLENOID!

I made that very clear in my previous message!

So I don't understand:

Why Do you write something that you know isn't true?
You have done so in the past:
Solenoid in Pentax K-70 - Page 4 - PentaxForums.com
Here I made it very clear to you but you still seem to have this urge to write something that by now you know isn't true:
New K-70 and Aperture Block - Page 5 - PentaxForums.com
Why?

May I remind you of that very sensible advice:

Of course you don't add any new information, not even old information but wrong information!
As you had been corrected about this error several times: Is there any intention behind that?
How can it be brought over to you finally?


Also:
Why do you invent some new word called "abt" when since a long time we speak about Aperture-Block-Failure = ABF?

The main article is clear enough, every information is right there.
I usually post on my smart phone and make occasional spelling errors;
this part of your response was such a trivial response - not a big deal at all.

My response was an attempt to correct some misunderstanding shown in the comment I responded to.
I thought I was in basic agreement with you.
I’m sorry you apparently did not approve and apparently felt a need to correct me.

My post stated there is a difference between what was produced in Japan and what is now produced in China - that was my purpose.
Do you disagree with my main point?

Last edited by reh321; 10-31-2021 at 04:38 AM.
02-18-2022, 04:33 AM - 1 Like   #81
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
photogem's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,484
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
I usually post on my smart phone and make occasional spelling errors;
Understood....
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
.. this part of your response was such a trivial response - not a big deal at all.
In retrospect yes, agreed.
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
My response was an attempt to correct some misunderstanding shown in the comment I responded to.
Somehow I felt it led to further confusion. Maybe still a problem of language.

Member @lesmore49 asked if the ESII has solenoids, I answered "no".

So when you responded with:
QuoteOriginally posted by reh321 Quote
Your “ES II” is excluded from ‘abf’ effects in any case - just as my “Super Program” of ten years later is excluded - because they used Japanese-made solenoids.....
I read that as "not agreeing" with what I wrote, i.e. I still understand your message saying "they (i.e. ES II + Super Program) used Japanese made solenoids.

I guess you just didn't write this message clear enough?!
02-18-2022, 08:56 AM   #82
retired sw engineer
Loyal Site Supporter
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 21,223
QuoteOriginally posted by photogem Quote
Understood....

In retrospect yes, agreed.

Somehow I felt it led to further confusion. Maybe still a problem of language.

Member @lesmore49 asked if the ESII has solenoids, I answered "no".

So when you responded with:

I read that as "not agreeing" with what I wrote, i.e. I still understand your message saying "they (i.e. ES II + Super Program) used Japanese made solenoids.

I guess you just didn't write this message clear enough?!
We have had our disagreements in the past. I understand how someone from Switzerland might not understand the political implications to an American of identifying a solenoid as “from China”.

I previously said there was no acceptance test to weed out the solenoids that would fail. Perhaps outside lawyers - possibly aided by {expensive} outside engineers, have found a test that works, but we still don’t know if it matters enough to Pentax for this knowledge to change their ways.

04-14-2022, 06:45 PM - 1 Like   #83
Moderator
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
MarkJerling's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Wairarapa, New Zealand
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,985
Thats for the additional photos @photogem.
So, even smaller magnet in the latest versions. Very interesting.
04-25-2022, 04:38 PM   #84
retired sw engineer
Loyal Site Supporter
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 21,223
I purchased my “Super Program” in 1983 and then used it for over 12 years - the longest I’ve used any camera - and periodically since then. When I last used it {a year or two ago} the aperture control mechanism still worked, so there was nothing wrong with the concept - just the recent implementation {I.e., the part used}.
06-03-2022, 03:20 PM   #85
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2014
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 111
QuoteOriginally posted by MarkJerling Quote
Very interesting! Thank you for posting this history of the development of the solenoid.
Thank you! Great article, very detailed with meticulous approach to subtle nuances. . We managed to fix this problem in K70 after getting a white solenoid from eBay. The only thing : should I lock the screw that holds the solenoid in place with a glue?Initially it was locked with some kind of resin, apparently to prevent self loosening as a result of vibrations.

---------- Post added 06-03-22 at 07:22 PM ----------

QuoteOriginally posted by photogem Quote
Update:
*istD has 2 solenoids, one in the flash-circuit, one for aperture/diaphragm-control
*istDS and DS2 (as well as Samsung GX1s) have only 1 solenoid (Aperture)
*istDL/2 (Samsung GX1L) have again 2 solenoids


1 solenoid to be found in K10D, K20D (Samsung GX10/20) as well (Aperture)

2 solenoids to be found in:
K100D, K110D, K200D, Km(K2000), Kx, Kr (but in EU and Switzerland most of those have already the green solenoid in the flash-circuit!)


1 green solenoid to be found in:
K30/50/500/KS1/KS2/K-70

modified better green solenoid found in:
K50/K-S1/K-S2 from December 2015 onwards
K-70
Thank you! Great article, very detailed with meticulous approach to subtle nuances. . We managed to fix this problem in K70 after getting a white solenoid from eBay. The only thing : should I lock the screw that holds the solenoid in place with a glue?Initially it was locked with some kind of resin, apparently to prevent self loosening as a result of vibrations.
06-03-2022, 11:09 PM - 1 Like   #86
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
photogem's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,484
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by hatsofe Quote
Thank you! Great article, very detailed with meticulous approach to subtle nuances . We managed to fix this problem in K70 after getting a white solenoid from eBay. The only thing: Should I lock the screw that holds the solenoid in place with a glue?
Initially it was locked with some kind of resin, apparently to prevent self loosening as a result of vibrations.
Hello and well done, I saw you used the K-70 tutorial.

Pentax used some red thread-locking-laquer Pentax. As I came across some older versions were no such laquer was applied I never felt the need to use it, the solenoid nor the fixing screw ever came loose.
But if you want to play save, you could use some nailvarnish instead, if no thread-locking laquer at hand.

In the K30/50 tutorial as well in the K-S1-tutorial I mentioned this laquer but later on no longer as I stopped using it.
06-04-2022, 03:46 PM   #87
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 685
The K-70 we use at work needs a new solenoid. Where do I go to get one? I see them on eBay with prices ranging from $10 (shipped from Belarus) to $45 shipped from Japan. What is the recommendation?
06-04-2022, 08:22 PM - 1 Like   #88
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
photogem's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,484
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by brofkand Quote
The K-70 we use at work needs a new solenoid. Where do I go to get one? I see them on eBay with prices ranging from $10 (shipped from Belarus) to $45 shipped from Japan. What is the recommendation?
Only this one on ebay:
Pentax K-30 K-50 K-70 K-S1/S2 K-500 Genuine White Solenoid Part - Japan - | eBay (this is the only "made in Japan DSLR" version*)

The Belarus version (as well as the one fron Poland!) isn't even one for Pentax but for DVD-ROM drives and can be recognized by the blue color.
Those usually have 15 ohms only (and the largest magnet, i.e. way way stronger holding force).
There are no Japanese sellers.

There are 2 sellers from Europe.

a) one from Germany (kilo404): Not DSLR but SLR version (he at least indirectly mentions it)
b) one from UK (randr2012): Not DSLR but SLR version

clever disguised as he writes:
"This is an original solenoid plunger removed from a donor camera, these solenoids were made in Japan and lastly used in K-r and K-x."

*I have zero connection to the seller potmano in USA!
06-05-2022, 04:15 AM - 1 Like   #89
Senior Member




Join Date: Sep 2014
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 111
QuoteOriginally posted by brofkand Quote
The K-70 we use at work needs a new solenoid. Where do I go to get one? I see them on eBay with prices ranging from $10 (shipped from Belarus) to $45 shipped from Japan. What is the recommendation?
We used the solenoid that photogem mentioned in his answer to you ( Pentax K-30 K-50 K-70 K-S1/S2 K-500 Genuine White Solenoid Part - Japan - | eBay ). We replaced the solenoid two days ago and checked it out in action yesterday. The camera functioned flawlessly. So far so good.
Advice: mark down each screw position while removing the outer casing, because there are three-four groups of different length screws in it. The depth of each screw hole, of course can be verified with a simple needle , but marking them (positioning on a sketch against their proper holes, for example) during disassembling avoids confusion and time waste later. Also: there is a small round washer- like spacer that seats(I hope, that is where it was !) around a microphone connector ,which falls off when you remove the side panel.
06-05-2022, 04:21 AM   #90
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
photogem's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 2,484
Original Poster
Remember:
This is not the tutorial thread but it is the thread for the history of the solenoid!
Further posts please either in the "DIY section":
Do-It-Yourself - PentaxForums.com

or here in the DSLR specific section:
DSLR-Specific Forums - PentaxForums.com
Thanks!
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
aperture, approach, battery, bodies, cameras, evidence, force, gn, k-30, k-50, k-70, kp, magnet, motor, pentax, pentax k30, pentax k50, production, resin, result, samsung, self, solenoid, teflon, unit, vibrations, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manual solenoid replacement Pentax K30 / Discharge flash-condenser / Solenoid choice photogem Pentax K-30 & K-50 153 05-26-2022 12:07 AM
Manual: Solenoid replacement: Pentax K-S1 photogem Pentax K-S1 & K-S2 44 05-04-2022 10:05 AM
Manual: Solenoid Replacment Pentax K-30/50/500 + Discharge of flash-condenser photogem Do-It-Yourself 17 12-26-2021 01:22 PM
Architecture Wee Bit Of History Kerrowdown Post Your Photos! 15 04-04-2021 01:35 PM
"What we learn from history is that we don't learn from history." jolepp General Talk 7 05-19-2012 09:38 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top