Meanwhile, I have been able to use additional material and I have to correct my earlier size estimate.
Originally posted by falconeye Taking my own image (i.e., the guessed position of lower border (**)), I end up with the following measures: [...]
[...]
So, the K7D is about as high as a K200D and about as narrow as a K-m.
I was not correct. Sorry for this.
Part of the confusion comes from the fact that K-m did have a
thinner lens mount metal ring than K-7! I now corrected for this systematic error.
Originally posted by Matjazz I've been playing in auto cad (yes, Im' bored @ work) Outline of new K is green. Measures are in milimeters.
The dimensions given by Matjazz suffer from the same problem.
These are my new (and more accurate from better input) size estimates for K-7. Estimated to be exact +/- 2 mm:
............. K-m K200D K-7 K20D
Width [mm]: 122.5 133.5 130 142.0
Height [mm]: 91.5 _95.0 100 101.0
So, this is about nearly as wide as K200D and about nearly as high as K20D.
Which puts it sizewise in between K200D and K20D.