Originally posted by Brenda Lee I'm curious, why forget the UV filter? I put one on my 18-55 kit lens as soon as I got ... just because I thought you were supposed to.
Hi Brenda, and welcome
There are many people who think that the downsides of a UV filter (extra piece of glass to cause flare etc problems) outweigh the benefits, (protection for the lens) On the other hand there are many who think the opposite. Basically the first group uses hoods for protection rather than filters. We therefore have periodic filter vs hood wars with impassioned posts for both points of view. My thoughts are that it doesn't much matter which way you go for the less expensive lenses, but I feel the top shelf lenses do better without. Think about putting a relatively cheap piece of glass in front of a $600 or more lens. BTW I always use a hood, not only for flare control and protection but I've also found (and tests back me up) that using a hood boosts the contrast making the colors brighter and snappier. I think that to a certain degree filter use is pushed by retailers who get to sell you another piece of equipment. Hoods are usually included on
most lenses. (some of the kit lenses don't) but filters are always an extra.
edit: Jeff above reminded me when a filter is very much required and that is in very dusty/sandy environments.
NaCl(hope that helps)H2O