First DSLR: Used K100, K200, K-m, or K-x?

kenafein · 05-27-2011, 07:04 PM

I just recently decided between a used k20d and a new kr(tough call). I havent got to play with the kr yet, but the k20d can be had for under 400 dollars online. Might be a bit too pro for a fellow noob, but you'll learn faster.

mlatour · 05-27-2011, 07:25 PM

My 2 cents to OP,
For low-light performance on a budget, look for a used K-x (body only) and Tamron 17-50mm f2.8
Invest in some good NiMH rechargeable AA's; Eneloops / Ansmann (not common Wal-Mart Energizers or Duracells) and you'll have a dependable power supply.

Michel

macky112 · 05-28-2011, 08:33 AM

Originally posted by mlatour

My 2 cents to OP,
For low-light performance on a budget, look for a used K-x (body only) and Tamron 17-50mm f2.8
Invest in some good NiMH rechargeable AA's; Eneloops / Ansmann (not common Wal-Mart Energizers or Duracells) and you'll have a dependable power supply.

Michel

I took the same route as suggested by this post:

and +1 on the K-x, but semi +1 on the Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 if you can find a good copy

rcicerch · 05-28-2011, 11:44 AM

Thanks for all the suggestions. Looks like k-x is the way to go for me. Although the K-r deal at Costco looks sweet, but it is not in my budget

Stone G. · 05-28-2011, 12:22 PM

Originally posted by rcicerch

First Post!

....... My wife is frustrated with slow autofocus and the ho-hum picture quality.

.......... But.. the allure of new technology like faster autofocus and faster burst rate of the K-x makes me rethink. I'm also not ruling out the K200 or K2000, but for best low-light, it sounds like K100 is a better option? I don't think I need the weather sealing of the 200. For me, the low light performance is more important.

So, any suggestions? ......

Rob

I have the K200D and I find it great for many, many good reasons.

NONETHELESS, since low light performance, both noise- and autofocus wise, is what really matters for you and your wife there is no doubt in my mind: Go for the K-x and you won't go wrong!

05-27-2011, 07:25 PM	#17
mlatour Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Montreal Posts: 197	My 2 cents to OP, For low-light performance on a budget, look for a used K-x (body only) and Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 Invest in some good NiMH rechargeable AA's; Eneloops / Ansmann (not common Wal-Mart Energizers or Duracells) and you'll have a dependable power supply. Michel Last edited by mlatour; 05-28-2011 at 12:38 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wanted - Acquired: Pentax Camera Body + Lens Collections (K-5, K-7, K-r, K-x, K20, K10, K200,	mackloon	Sold Items	0	05-16-2011 12:54 PM
Radio-link flash for both K100 and K200	peterh337	Flashes, Lighting, and Studio	0	01-18-2009 09:08 AM
k200 or k20 for 1st dslr	dazman	Pentax DSLR Discussion	8	05-24-2008 12:31 AM
viewfinder lcd display k100 vs. k200	tibbitts	Pentax DSLR Discussion	0	05-06-2008 03:13 PM

05-27-2011, 07:04 PM	#16
kenafein Veteran Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Southern California Photos: Albums Posts: 4,082	I just recently decided between a used k20d and a new kr(tough call). I havent got to play with the kr yet, but the k20d can be had for under 400 dollars online. Might be a bit too pro for a fellow noob, but you'll learn faster.

05-28-2011, 08:33 AM	#18
macky112 Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Irvine, CA Photos: Albums Posts: 45	Originally posted by mlatour My 2 cents to OP, For low-light performance on a budget, look for a used K-x (body only) and Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 Invest in some good NiMH rechargeable AA's; Eneloops / Ansmann (not common Wal-Mart Energizers or Duracells) and you'll have a dependable power supply. Michel I took the same route as suggested by this post: and +1 on the K-x, but semi +1 on the Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 if you can find a good copy

05-28-2011, 11:44 AM	#19
rcicerch New Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Boston Posts: 3 Original Poster	Thanks for all the suggestions. Looks like k-x is the way to go for me. Although the K-r deal at Costco looks sweet, but it is not in my budget

05-28-2011, 12:22 PM	#20
Stone G. Pentaxian Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: North Zealand, Denmark Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 1,516	Originally posted by rcicerch First Post! ....... My wife is frustrated with slow autofocus and the ho-hum picture quality. .......... But.. the allure of new technology like faster autofocus and faster burst rate of the K-x makes me rethink. I'm also not ruling out the K200 or K2000, but for best low-light, it sounds like K100 is a better option? I don't think I need the weather sealing of the 200. For me, the low light performance is more important. So, any suggestions? ...... Rob I have the K200D and I find it great for many, many good reasons. NONETHELESS, since low light performance, both noise- and autofocus wise, is what really matters for you and your wife there is no doubt in my mind: Go for the K-x and you won't go wrong!