Originally posted by pimentel1980 Hi everyone, I have a Pentax IstDs and I saw on an internet ad a nikon 3000 for 300 dollars, I would like to know if this one is better than my pentax, I would like some advice, any help would be appreciate it.
I think it depends on what you want to do with the camera?
The D300 would most likely be comparable to the K200 from pentax, i.e. a 10MP CCD sensor. (in fact i think the same or similar sony one)
What you get is more MP but a very limited dynamic range, hogh contrast sensor really good only for 100-400 ISO.
What you give up is obvious, all your lenses, total incompatability even with nikon legacy lenses (OK they mount and you can trip the shutter) but mo metering at all.
You would be better to get a used K10D or K200D and have shake reduction, HSM support retain all your lenses etc.....
personally i see no point. Pentax equivelent bodies would cost the same. Aside from that if you have any legacy lenses the *istDs is a very good body to keep as it supports TTL flash for legacy lenses, something newer bodies don't support