Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-02-2012, 01:20 PM   #1
New Member




Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: London
Posts: 4
DA or DA L 55-300

I understand that optically the Pentax DA 55-300mm and the DA L 55-300 are the same. The differences being a metal mount, a hood and quick shift.

I only have experience of the kit lens (18-55mm) so no quick shift and there are plenty of DA L 55-300mm versions available from tiawan via ebay.

But is quick shift really worth investing in? I understand it as a concept but in practice will it make a huge difference?

Many thanks
Stuart

02-02-2012, 01:21 PM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,958
It's nice to have, but if you're a beginner, it won't make much of a difference.

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

02-02-2012, 01:33 PM   #3
Veteran Member
Docrwm's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere in the Southern US
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,275
Not that I have noticed. The 55-300 is intended for sunlight use and mine has seen most of its use shooting sports with my children. Under those conditions I haven't done much MF of the lens. The more important issue is a hood IMHO. It's a MUST HAVE for the lens.
02-02-2012, 05:15 PM   #4
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 10,287
QuoteOriginally posted by Docrwm Quote
The more important issue is a hood IMHO. It's a MUST HAVE for the lens.
Agree. I use the quick shift on my DA*16-50 all the time. But I have never felt a need for it with my DA L 55-300. I think it is that at those focal lengths I am not second guessing the auto-focus.

But a hood is an absolute requirement. You can get a cheap ebay one for a few bucks that works fine or the official one for a lot more. None of this is to say I would not take the DA model in a heart beat if the price was comparable though. But I don't think the DA is worth a lot more just for quick shift.

02-02-2012, 05:26 PM   #5
Site Supporter
Nowhere Matt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nowhere Land
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,312
From Taiwan on eBay could mean "grey market" which could mean in 90 days a defect will cost you $200. Read those carefully.

DA-L versions are great also if you don't want to spend the extra money. I've used a DA 50-150 with quick shift and a DA L 55-300 without.
02-02-2012, 05:33 PM   #6
Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Liverpool, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 12,296
QuoteOriginally posted by Nowhere Matt Quote
From Taiwan on eBay could mean "grey market" which could mean in 90 days a defect will cost you $200.
All DA L lenses not sold in a kit are "grey market". I bought mine from Tri-State Camera. Couldn't be happier. It is by far my favorite lens, just spend a couple quid on a hood for it.
02-02-2012, 05:40 PM   #7
Site Supporter
ramseybuckeye's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Elida, Ohio
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 8,114
I have the DA55-300 and use quick shift all the time, especially if you are shooting something like birds and don't want to scare them. It's way faster than waiting for the autofocus when you are changing targets from close to far. I rarely don't use it. After using quick shift I would not buy a non-quick shift lens if the same optics came in a quick shift version.

I would also not use an outdoor lens without a hood, so you need to figure that into your cost, there are imitations that are much cheaper, sometime they fit a little loose, but way cheaper than the Pentax hood.
02-02-2012, 07:03 PM   #8
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago suburbs
Photos: Albums
Posts: 848
I bought an ebay hood for my DAL 55-300 and am happy with it. It will reverse for storage and even has the little 'window' for a polarizing filter.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
55-300mm, camera, da, pentax help, photography, shift
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nikon D7000 + 70-300 VR vs. Pentax K5 + Sigma 100-300 highyellow1 Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 41 05-06-2011 07:40 AM
For Sale - Sold: Primes: F*300/4.5, A*300/4, FA35/2, Viv 105/2.5 Macro, A28/2.8, A135/2.8 (Worl thirdofthree Sold Items 5 10-23-2010 04:40 PM
SMC-K 300/4 vs Super Takumar 300/4 -- Tripod Mounts, image quality? tendim Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 03-20-2010 09:25 AM
TESTED: Pentax 55-300 vs. Sigma 70-300 vs. Tamron 70-300 falconeye Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 22 05-14-2009 04:01 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top