Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 2 Likes Search this Thread
11-20-2012, 11:11 AM   #1
Veteran Member
romansolar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kosice,Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 440
Takumar Front element scratch!

Hi folks

i would like to ask, how could little scratch affect image quality? i found interesting lens and seller posted picture with info about tiny scratch. I have no experience, is this little scratch affecting image quality or overall performance of lens?

thanks so much for your opinion!



11-20-2012, 11:25 AM - 1 Like   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Washington Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,992
Any scratches on the front element will affect the image somewhat. The question is whether it will be noticeable. In most cases minor scratches cannot be seen in the image. The exception to this is when shooting into the sun (or lights) you might get a mark or flare that is more pronounced. This one is off to the side a bit which makes it even less likely to be a problem.

You also need to consider the cost and availability of the lens. If it is really cheap, or really hard to find I would take a chance on it. If it is a common focal length and at only a reasonable price then forget it and move on there are usually lots of Takumars for sale in the common focal lengths. You do not mention what lens this is but post that and we can give a better idea how often those come up for sale and a reasonable price.
11-20-2012, 11:26 AM - 1 Like   #3
Veteran Member
riff's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,408
I'd say it's unlikely to affect the image, it should affect the price though!

If it's rare or cheap I'd risk it, if it's common and normally cheap I'd pass.
11-20-2012, 11:27 AM   #4
Veteran Member
romansolar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kosice,Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 440
Original Poster
thanks dear jatrax,riff!

its Asahi Pentax Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 1:3.5/28 28mm screwmount m42 lens

50$

11-20-2012, 11:49 AM   #5
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jatrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Washington Cascades
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,992
Recent sales on ebay run from $35 to $85 usd. Also depends on whether the hood and case are included. Also be sure to check carefully for fungus, quite common on lenses of this age.

$50 is in the middle and I would say a good price if it were mint. With scratch, maybe a little high unless the hood is included. There are currently about 50 of that lens for sale on ebay so quite common. If you need it now OK but I think for the about the same price or a little more you could get a mint one if you are patient or ask him to take some $$ off for the scratch.

Also, make sure you get the hood. Hoods are much more important for these older lenses as the anti-flare coatings are not as good as modern lenses.
11-20-2012, 12:03 PM   #6
Veteran Member
romansolar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kosice,Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 440
Original Poster
thank you jatrax!

hood not included

i will check it, of course i dont need it right away i am really interested in 28mm now. i found also few smc m 28mm 2.8, less expensive but probably super takumar 28/3.5 is better.
11-20-2012, 12:05 PM   #7
Veteran Member
riff's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,408
Average price in the lens database is $48.
A quick ebay check showed sold tak 28s in the 40 to 90 dollar range.

Is it local, quick to get, can you negotiate price, the square hood sells for ~$20 .
Price is OK but you could save 10 buxs if you invest much time hunting.
I see you have a Tokina 28 f/2.8

It's a slipper slope, very easy to end up will lots of Taks, if you like Taks and I'm betting you will. Good luck!

11-20-2012, 12:07 PM   #8
Veteran Member
riff's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,408
Jatrax is fast!

P.S I find the Takumars much nice to use then the Ms. You can shoot in AV or M mode.

Last edited by riff; 11-20-2012 at 12:09 PM. Reason: Added content
11-20-2012, 12:12 PM   #9
Veteran Member
romansolar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kosice,Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 440
Original Poster
thanks riff! appreciate. will think about, also no hood so maybe i will pass. Yes you are right, i have tokina. But dont know, something wrong with it, from my last trip i have decent photos from m 1.7 but not from tokina they are soft and dull. dont know, will test it again, maybe i cant compare 50mm smc 1.7 and tokina 2.8. Or maybe i made something wrong.
11-20-2012, 12:23 PM   #10
Pentaxian
johnyates's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Saskatoon, SK
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,345
I've been watching 28mm 3.5 Taks for a while now on eBay. There seems to be a never ending stream of them. If I were you I'd wait for one without a scratch.

QuoteQuote:
28mm Taks are like streetcars -- there'll be another one along in 5 minutes.
11-20-2012, 12:34 PM   #11
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tyneside
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 69
I dont think the scratch will effect the images , but you will need to buy a hood for it , you can get one cheap enough ,
a friend of mine has a smc Takumar 28mm f3.5 up for sale in good condition ,hes UK based but i do know he delivers world wide.
asahi-pentax | Classic Photographics
11-20-2012, 12:46 PM   #12
Senior Member
bluenose's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: S. Ontario
Posts: 227
This is always a good read when the subject of scratches comes up.

LensRentals.com - Front Element Scratches

Regards
11-20-2012, 01:02 PM   #13
Veteran Member
vladimiroltean's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,465
In my experience the M28/2.8 is better than the Tak 28/3.5.
And you won't notice anything on the glass unless it's big. I have many "ugly" lenses that take "beautiful" pictures. I have taken pictures with a lens with broken glass. You wouldn't notice it unless you were told.
11-20-2012, 01:07 PM   #14
Veteran Member
romansolar's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Kosice,Slovakia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 440
Original Poster
thank you all for valuable feedback!
11-20-2012, 03:26 PM   #15
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 648
QuoteOriginally posted by kcobain1992 Quote
In my experience the M28/2.8 is better than the Tak 28/3.5.
I got the same experience it gives much more CA than M 28..., but 28/3.5 is fun to play with.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
image, lens, pentax help, quality, scratch

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hundreds of small dots undernearth front element ironlionzion Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 20 11-05-2021 07:18 AM
FA 31mm Limited: filters touching front element? baj Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 21 03-24-2014 12:24 AM
7 element super takumar vs 8 element 50 1,4 fikkser Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 3 07-13-2013 07:59 AM
how to clean the front element nirVaan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 08-13-2011 02:09 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top