Originally posted by Medium FormatPro If one continually fills it up and then uses the in camera options to delete selective ones. Then continuing the process a number of times - will in fact add to the write times for the camera. Think of it as a version of "needing to defrag".
Despite the fact that SD cards are used with a FAT (File Allocation Table) file system, the defrag problem has no meaning for SD cards, USB sticks and SSD drives.
These read/write devices offer a limited number of writing processes to the same cells, before these cells fail.
To maximize the time till the first failings, their built-in controller is mapping the real FAT to a virtual one. The mapping is based on a histogram of the usage of the cells. With every writing process, it will choose randomly from locations with the fewest usage. The operating system will be shown a "faked" (= virtual) FAT.
So defragmentation or formatting has not the same effect as it would have with a hard disk, as any writing will be redirected to a unknown location. Even formatting is just starting a special routine of the chip controller.
However, formatting may of course help if the FAT mapping got corrupted by write failings, power brake down, or bugs in the camera ROM, or any other disruption of a writing process (the weak point of all FAT based systems).
EDIT:
I've not tested it, but if continuing selective deleting and writing really slows down the handling by the camera, the reason could be a non-existing re-organisation of the card diretory the camera holds - no "garbage collection".
If this is the case, removing the card and inserting it again should force the camera to read the (virtual) structure from the card again, and then there should be a "clean" sheet.