Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-26-2013, 06:21 PM   #1
Site Supporter
wolfdog's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 27
looking to move up.

I am looking to move up to a KD20 or the K 7. Have a ist Ds. Shoot landscape ,wildlife, the grand kids, brids,about anything that looks like it needs a picture taken.
What do you think about the two cameras.

Thanks for any help.

03-26-2013, 06:27 PM   #2
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 43,114
Why not get a current camera such as the K-30 (used it will be close to the price of the K-7)? Even better image quality than the other two!

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com's high server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover those costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

03-26-2013, 07:05 PM   #3
Veteran Member
VisualDarkness's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,441
I would say that for the small extra cost for the K-5 instead of a K-7 you get a way more versatile camera when it comes to image quality in the same casing. K-7 is decent as long as you stay out of higher ISO but you feel much less restricted with a K-5.
03-26-2013, 07:40 PM   #4
Veteran Member
Docrwm's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Somewhere in the Southern US
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 11,275
Those are going for $350-450 used. The K-30 is a better camera in a lot of ways, especially if you want focus peaking (which is great for manual focus lenses). BNIB from an AD they are going for $500ish these days.

03-26-2013, 08:33 PM   #5
Loyal Site Supporter
SteveM's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,295
I found the K5 to be a huge step-up from my K-7 and the price has been dropping since the K5II and K5IIs were released. The K30 is a great camera but after also having a K-m / K-x / K-r for my wife, I find it's worth spending the extra $100 or so for the higher end camera.
03-26-2013, 09:33 PM   #6
Banned




Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 390
QuoteOriginally posted by wolfdog Quote
I am looking to move up to a KD20 or the K 7. Have a ist Ds. Shoot landscape ,wildlife, the grand kids, brids,about anything that looks like it needs a picture taken.
What do you think about the two cameras.

Thanks for any help.
I've never used a K7, but I don't think you could go wrong with either. If you want to shoot video you'll need the K7, if you're only interested in still photos, go for the K20, it's a fine camera and probably can be found for less $$$. be forewarned though, it is a bit larger and heavier than the *ist family.
03-27-2013, 12:36 AM   #7
Site Supporter




Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,389
K5 are getting ridiculously cheap...I would get a 2nd hand one.
03-27-2013, 12:52 AM   #8
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2012
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 345
As others have said, if you're considering a K7, go with the K5 or the K-30. You can't lose with them. (They're both great cameras)

03-27-2013, 02:36 AM   #9
Moderator PEG Judges
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 32,682
You can afford to spend a bit more on your camera, because all your existing lenses will still fit, so your actually saving money not spending it.
03-27-2013, 10:00 AM - 1 Like   #10
Pentaxian
Just1MoreDave's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,859
Between the K20D and the K-7, I chose the K-7. The K-7 introduced the current chassis, viewfinder, shutter, 77 segment metering, rear LCD and button layout that Pentax used for the K-5, K-5II, K-5IIs and I think K-30. It's magnesium alloy, really great for comparing with your brother-in-law's consumer-grade Canon. It's a lot smaller and lighter than the K20D, but not quite as small or light as the *ist DS. The K-7 sensor is slightly different than the K20D, modified to make video and live view work, just slightly worse at high ISO noise. I like the size, LCD, metering and live view advantages. I never use the video, burst mode or other differences. It is a worthwhile upgrade over the *ist DS.

The unofficial forum rule is to take what you're willing to spend and add 20%. If you can do that, the K-5 takes all the great stuff from the K-7 and adds a great sensor. When the K20D and K-7 were new, the biggest complaint was that the Samsung sensor was not great at high ISOs. It was worse than the lower-tier models like the K-x and K-r. Some people bought K-x or K-r models as second cameras just for that high-ISO performance. The K-5 sensor is even better at high ISO settings than the K-x and K-r. That kind of range is really useful for some shots. There are some other upgrades between K-7 and K-5: newer AF system, higher burst mode, better video, more USER modes - but the ISO difference really dwarfs those. It is really worth the cost difference, especially at used prices.

The K-30 is a great midrange model with the huge advantage that you can get it new. You have to look really hard for the few features left off the K-5 series to make it midrange. The really important stuff is there: sensor, viewfinder, two dials, etc. The K-5/K-30 decision is a really hard choice to make.
03-27-2013, 11:12 AM   #11
Veteran Member
Ken T's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 537
I would go with K30
03-27-2013, 12:52 PM   #12
Site Supporter
wolfdog's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 27
Original Poster
Thanks everyone for your input.Gives me somethings to think about before I do anything,Thanks Mike
03-27-2013, 02:12 PM   #13
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NewYork
Posts: 899
I have recently upgraded from and ist-ds to a k-01 (same sensor as the k-30). The high iso performance (how well it will work in low light, how clean high iso images look) is worlds better. I haven't had the camera long but I don't think I would object to using the new camera at iso 6400 (I have even started playing with higher iso's), where on the ist-ds I didn't really even like using iso 800. The images are better all around.

It would seem the k-30 performs much better in low light than the 2 you are looking at (which can be very beneficial even in normal room light, especially if you don't have a bunch of fast glass). If that matters to you, its a big + for the k-30.

DxOMark - Compare cameras side by side

If money is tight, you might want to consider the k-01 with 40mm kit lens as they are dirt cheap (if you can still get one). Do be aware that there are some significant shortcoming of the k-01 (to me at least) but I still think it was worth the money (especially since I got a $250 and the camera for $360). Pictures look great in low light even at high iso, but its not that great at auto focusing in low light (it will sometimes fail to focus at all). The ist-ds is a little better overall in its ability to lock focus in low light and its a rather old model camera. Of course you can manual focus but it has no focus conformation. It does have focus peaking and focus zoom which helps but I would rather have focus conformation. Under good conditions, it seems to focus faster than the ist-ds despite having to go back and forth, but in less than ideal conditions, its much slower. I think it was defiantly worth the money though a k-30 would have been nicer if I could afford it. I don't have any auto focus primes either so getting the 40mm cheap in the deal was a big plus to me also.
03-31-2013, 06:31 PM   #14
Forum Member




Join Date: May 2012
Location: Antigonish, Co. NS, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 60
I recently bought a used K5 from a forum member what an upgrade from my *ist DL.
Paul

Last edited by jpaulb; 03-31-2013 at 06:38 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, move, pentax help, photography
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Give up, Move on, Forget.... ? Steelski Photographic Industry and Professionals 103 04-14-2012 08:44 PM
Looking to move up to A K 5 offshore5 Pentax K-5 6 12-28-2011 07:57 PM
Looking to pick up a 55-300mm (questions) mojoe_24 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11 10-21-2011 08:09 PM
Loving Scanning - time to move up? dugrant153 Film Processing, Scanning, and Darkroom 23 10-29-2010 12:00 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:21 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top