Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-22-2013, 07:17 AM   #1
Senior Member




Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 145
Portrait photography

Is there a specific distance between camera and subject that is better for portrait photography\?

Thanks!!

-Chuck




04-22-2013, 07:40 AM   #2
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
maxfield_photo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,216
The "classic" portrait focal length is usually around 85mm in 35mm terms becauses it causes a slight perspective compression that is considered flattering (i.e. it makes the nose appear smaller). On APS-C that equates to about 55mm. So put your kit lens at 55mm, and stand so that you have the subject's head and shoulders in the frame. In practice it works out to about 6 or 8 feet, but I like to stand a little further back, maybe 10 or 12 feet, so I can later crop to different aspect ratios without having to clone the background.
04-22-2013, 07:56 AM   #3
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Canada_Rockies's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sparwood, BC, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 12,385
The 6-8 feet mentioned makes the perspective of the face appear natural - the ears are, to our eyes, the "right" size, the nose is not exaggerated. If your subject has a, errr, prominent, nose, back up a bit, if the ears are like mine and Prince Charles, move in a bit to shrink them.

A wig stand is a perfect subject to play with the distances and see what effects you get.
04-22-2013, 08:00 AM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Roodepoort, South Africa
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,561
Define portraits I like something between 28mm and 35mm focal length for full body portraits; distance would be somewhere around 2.5 meters depending on length of subject.

04-22-2013, 08:09 AM   #5
PEG Moderator
Loyal Site Supporter
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland... "Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand" - William Blake
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 57,815
Dependant on the lens your using it will vary the distance to shoot from, for ideal focal lengths, others have already made good suggestions.

I would just add try to fill the frame with head and shoulder or three quarter shots, with your chosen lens.
04-22-2013, 08:12 AM   #6
Senior Member




Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 145
Original Poster
More for head and shoulders shots.

I think I'm going to buy a 77mm Limited this week.
04-22-2013, 10:38 AM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Perrineville, NJ
Posts: 1,375
Some full-length portraits of models are taken from low-to-ground, using a wider-than-normal lens. Makes the models' legs look longer, relative to the torso.

But since I'm not a pro and don't shoot models, I stick with telephoto (short to medium) lenses.

04-22-2013, 11:57 AM   #8
Senior Member
screwdriver222's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Plymouth
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 139
QuoteOriginally posted by maxfield_photo Quote
The "classic" portrait focal length is usually around 85mm in 35mm terms becauses it causes a slight perspective compression that is considered flattering (i.e. it makes the nose appear smaller). On APS-C that equates to about 55mm. So put your kit lens at 55mm, and stand so that you have the subject's head and shoulders in the frame. In practice it works out to about 6 or 8 feet, but I like to stand a little further back, maybe 10 or 12 feet, so I can later crop to different aspect ratios without having to clone the background.
Forgive me if i am wrong but isn't a 85mm lens on 35mm film still an 85mm lens on APS. The difference only being the cameras APS sensor only captures a cropped portion of the image. The cropped image appears 1.5 times larger. So should we still use a 85mm lens but stand further back?

Please correct me if am wrong, i am only trying to learn like everone else.

Regards Jeff
04-22-2013, 12:49 PM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NoVa The "burg"
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 899
It depends on what you're trying to achieve. And what your style is.
04-22-2013, 12:52 PM   #10
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: NoVa The "burg"
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 899
QuoteOriginally posted by screwdriver222 Quote
Forgive me if i am wrong but isn't a 85mm lens on 35mm film still an 85mm lens on APS. The difference only being the cameras APS sensor only captures a cropped portion of the image. The cropped image appears 1.5 times larger. So should we still use a 85mm lens but stand further back?

Please correct me if am wrong, i am only trying to learn like everone else.

Regards Jeff
If I'm not mistaken an 85mm is still indeed an 85 "but" it will hold an effective focal length of 127.5mm in "fullframe standards" because it's cropped.

Fullframe 85mm = 85mm
APC-S = 85mm x 1.5
04-22-2013, 02:12 PM - 2 Likes   #11
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
maxfield_photo's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 1,216
QuoteOriginally posted by screwdriver222 Quote
Forgive me if i am wrong but isn't a 85mm lens on 35mm film still an 85mm lens on APS. The difference only being the cameras APS sensor only captures a cropped portion of the image. The cropped image appears 1.5 times larger. So should we still use a 85mm lens but stand further back?

Please correct me if am wrong, i am only trying to learn like everone else.

Regards Jeff
You certainly could, but it would give a different effect than using a 55mm on an APS-C camera and standing in the same place that you would with an 85mm on a full frame. The key is the amount of perspective distortion, or foreshortening that occurs.

Perspective is determined by one thing and one thing only, where you stand in relation to your subject. Focal length has no effect on it, it's just that shorter focal lengths allow you to stand closer while framing the same subject, while longer focal lengths force you to stand further back.

To illustrate, imagine this scenario: Let's say I'm shooting a portrait with my PZ-1p and an FA* 85mm. I want to get a head and shoulders shot of my subject, so I turn the camera in vertical orientation and stand about 6 feet from my subject and take the shot. Now I decided I want to create the exact same image on my K20d. I take the FA* 85 off my film body and put it on my digital body. Because I am in the same position, the perspective will be the same, but there's just one problem, I'm now chopping off my subject's head. If I back up, I can get my subject completely in the frame again, but the perspective will change. The face will flatten a bit, but the ears will look a bit larger in relation.

If I really want to create the exact same image, I need to maintain my position but switch to a lens that counteracts the camera's crop factor like the DA* 55. In fact, I believe that's why that lens was designed, to replicate the perspective and field of view of a classic portrait lens. It's the same with the DA* 50-135, it roughly mimics the FA* 80-200.

Now that's not to say that 85mm is a bad focal length for portraits on an APS-C system, it's just that your subjects start to flatten out a bit. To carry the example further, imagine shooting an 85mm lens on the Q, your subjects would start to look very 2-dimensional, [Edit: because you'd be forced to stand WAY back.]

Last edited by maxfield_photo; 04-23-2013 at 10:50 AM.
04-23-2013, 10:43 AM   #12
Senior Member
screwdriver222's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Plymouth
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 139
QuoteOriginally posted by maxfield_photo Quote
You certainly could, but it would give a different effect than using a 55mm on an APS-C camera and standing in the same place that you would with an 85mm on a full frame. The key is the amount of perspective distortion, or foreshortening that occurs.

Perspective is determined by one thing and one thing only, where you stand in relation to your subject. Focal length has no effect on it, it's just that shorter focal lengths allow you to stand closer while framing the same subject, while longer focal lengths force you to stand further back.

To illustrate, imagine this scenario: Let's say I'm shooting a portrait with my PZ-1p and an FA* 85mm. I want to get a head and shoulders shot of my subject, so I turn the camera in vertical orientation and stand about 6 feet from my subject and take the shot. Now I decided I want to create the exact same image on my K20d. I take the FA* 85 off my film body and put it on my digital body. Because I am in the same position, the perspective will be the same, but there's just one problem, I'm now chopping off my subject's head. If I back up, I can get my subject completely in the frame again, but the perspective will change. The face will flatten a bit, but the ears will look a bit larger in relation.

If I really want to create the exact same image, I need to maintain my position but switch to a lens that counteracts the camera's crop factor like the DA* 55. In fact, I believe that's why that lens was designed, to replicate the perspective and field of view of a classic portrait lens. It's the same with the DA* 50-135, it roughly mimics the FA* 80-200.

Now that's not to say that 85mm is a bad focal length for portraits on an APS-C system, it's just that you subjects start to flatten out a bit. To carry the example further, imagine shooting an 85mm lens on the Q, your subjects would start to look very 2-dimensional.
Thanks for you excellent explaination maxfield. Fully understand it now.

Regards

Jeff
04-23-2013, 03:17 PM   #13
Veteran Member
Zafar Iqbal's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,229
QuoteOriginally posted by ChuckB28 Quote
More for head and shoulders shots.

I think I'm going to buy a 77mm Limited this week.
Go for it. Pretty much all of my studio portraits are shot using 70mm Limited. You can have a look on my website.
04-24-2013, 05:15 AM   #14
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dayton, OH
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 4,723
If you Google "Portrait Lens Focal Length Comparison", you will find many links with pictures.

Effect of Lens Focal Length on Portraits | Les Jones
Which Lens Should I Use? | Focal Length Comparison
The Ideal Focal Length for Portraiture: A Photographer's Experiment

You will need to read through the links to see if they are using full frame or crop sensor cameras.

Tim
04-24-2013, 07:39 AM   #15
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Roodepoort, South Africa
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,561
Let's add another one Comparison Of Tele To Wide Portraits | Orms Connect (FF/35mm camera used)
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, pentax help, photography, portrait
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What lens for portrait photography claudiamoroni Pentax Medium Format 19 05-11-2013 04:49 PM
Can you recommend a portrait photography book? bluebronco Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 9 09-20-2012 12:01 AM
People Portrait Photography Practice benny_h_z Post Your Photos! 2 10-23-2011 01:45 AM
Portrait Photography alhpro Photographic Technique 7 06-26-2010 01:19 AM
portrait photography lodi781 Photographic Technique 13 10-24-2008 08:06 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top