Originally posted by FunnyUncle I opened my mind and I realised that the members of this forum are little bit strange and blind...
I think I am both...haha ! However you and I are not the first that have asked the same questions. Just trust some of the experienced members and it will be figured out. Yes....we are all waiting for you to get the K3 camera back and see what the verdict is exactly. But be warned....if its ok you are going to ask for help all over again.
I think there is a big problem with language here also.
I sold my 18-55WR lens when I got the K3. Not because I tested it and found it to be bad. But only because of what others have said about the 18-135 being better and more versatile.
Now...do I like my K3 ? Sometimes YES and sometimes NO. For me it has the ability to be amazing. But sometimes I cant get the images I want and switch back to my K30 because I can get better consistency overall. Still learning the K3 !
---------- Post added 02-06-15 at 08:16 AM ----------
Originally posted by normhead When you look at the protozone numbers, you really wonder why more people don't use the 18-55. Really, it's not a bad lens. I stopped using it because anywhere I can use the 18-55 I can use the 18-135, with more reach and flexibility. Not because I thought the lens sucked.
If you can't get good images with a kit lens... it's not the lens,
Was this the regular or the WR 18-55 ? very nice !
I cant wait to go on my trip this summer. Where I live is very depressing , and when Im depressed the creative ability goes right out the window.....the photos here help lift my spirits . Thanks !