Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-20-2015, 06:21 PM   #1
Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 142
Bird shooting: longer focal length or crop with an affordable prime?

I've been progressively stepping up to greater focal lengths in affordable zooms in order to get more filling of the frame. From a 50-200 kit lens to the 55-300 and now the Sigma 150-500. 300mm is the minimum for my kind of shooting. The Sigma doesn't do a bad job but often has to be wide open (and fully extended) to have a shutter speed that will capture a moving bird, and the resulting IQ is just adequate. With a grip on the K3 the whole outfit makes for a bit of a work-out during a day's walk.

So the question is whether to go for an affordable prime, in particular the current Pentax 300mm, assuming that the IQ is good enough to allow cropping for a bigger image. This can be teamed up with my Tamron 1.4x teleconverter for more reach.

Also in the frame I guess is something like the Pentax 400mm for the 645, used with an adaptor. That won't have AF and will need stopping down for exposure reading as I understand it. Its 35mm film equivalent length is 260mm.

Is all this trying to have my cake and eat it too? Should I be trying higher ISOs with the Sigma to allow for stopping down to sweeter spot apertures? Coming from film days I've always been 'grain phobic'

06-20-2015, 06:43 PM   #2
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 49,785
If you pair the 300mm F4 with a TC, you'll probably end up with better image quality than your Sigma.

Adam Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography) server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover these costs by donating. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, KEH, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:

06-20-2015, 06:44 PM   #3
Pentaxian At Large
Loyal Site Supporter
robgski's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 4,858
IF you are using a K-3, you should be able to boost the ISO to at least 1600 without grain/noise becoming a problem, even with some cropping, and give you f8-f11 with a reasonable shutter speed. I'd give that a try before giving up on the Sigma, a 500mm lens is very nice to have.

My problem with a 500mm lens is that that it's very hard to get the subject in proper DOF, long lens really flatten out the 3D effect that a closer picture with a shorter lens would not.
06-20-2015, 07:14 PM   #4
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
jpzk's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Québec
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 7,986
With your K3, I would say the DA*300/4 with the HD 1.4x TC is likely to be the best according to your description.
You won't get to 500mm but cropping from the huge K3 files should bring you close to your goal.

06-20-2015, 07:40 PM - 2 Likes   #5
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Nelson B.C.
Posts: 3,763
A few points to consider.

1. Faster and longer is better. But both cost lots of money. There is a reason why people buy 600 f4's for a very high price, or even the 400 2.8. If you want to shoot early morning you need a fast lens. And unless you can smell them, a 300mm is too short. Essentially you have to decide how much you are going to spend then make the best of what you have.

2. Technique is 3/4 of the shot. What I mean by technique is not only handling of the lens and camera, although that is important, but being in the right place at the right time to get the shot you want. It is impossible to get a lens and body combination that can get every shot under every lighting conditions where you can just see the subject in the distance. So technique is finding how to get the best with what you have. Similar to bow hunters; they need to learn how to get very close to the game. A 300mm close in can get extremely nice shots; it is very very hard to get that close in. Technique also means that sometimes you stay home and dream about spending $6k or whatever to get something that would allow you to shoot that day. So decide what you are going to spend, get it and learn how to get very nice results from it.

3. Anything longer than 300mm requires techniques and skills that take a while to acquire. A soft shot at 500mm may be either a crappy lens or be vibration softness. The 150-500 is pretty reasonable at f8. Look at some of the results others are getting with that lens and try to match them. I had one for a year with the K-5 and got some very nice shots. It has it's limitations however. I could reasonably use it four months of the year when the light was high. I live in a valley and it is dark from fall to spring. I found that in most cases I could get similar results with the DA*300 on the K-3 cropped. The 1.4 TC as suggested by Adam is a very good combination

4. Be patient. There are quite a few people here who have made the journey you are embarking on and realize looking back that they sold lenses that they hadn't mastered. The skill required to get a very nice shot of wildlife with a long lens is considerable, but bad results are easy to blame on the equipment. On the other hand, better equipment will get you better shots, but only if you know how to handle them.

5. A solid tripod may get you more improvement for the dollar than anything else. A flash extender is an inexpensive way to get a couple stops of light, getting better results out of a slow lens for not too much money.

6. Learn how to do noise reduction to your satisfaction. You may gain a stop or two of effective shutter speed or aperture by mastering noise reduction. It isn't trivial to learn, because to take it to it's limit you have to understand the noise characteristics of the sensor and the techniques available. It can make a very big difference for not too much money.

There are a few manual long lenses about that get good results if handled correctly. The Tamron 400 f4 adaptall is a nice lens, as are the A400's. The 150-500 is a nice lens as well. A long lens sharp wide open will be expensive even if old and discontinued for the simple reason that they are in demand.

I have the DA*300 f4 and the Sigma 500 f4.5 on the K-3. The new long zoom is very attractive, but I'd have to sell a bunch of stuff to get it, and I'm not certain it would be an improvement.
06-20-2015, 08:35 PM   #6
Veteran Member
wissink's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: S-ON
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 606
I hope its okay that I ask this here. Reading this brought up a question I've been pondering. Using a 300 F4 lens and adding a 1.4x TC, the camera still says F4. Now I've read repeatedly that you lose a stop of light. Does this mean that it says F4 and mean F5.6? I'll step it down to 6.3, 7.1, or 8 for sharpness and contrast but are each of those numbers also a stop different? Can someone clarify this for me? Thanks
06-20-2015, 09:52 PM   #7
New Member

Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 5
I suggest to try high ISO first. Actually the light is enough so in this situation high ISO should have better performance than in low light conditions.

I have Sigma 150-500 too and in my opinion it is a quite good choice among zoom telegraph lenses.
06-20-2015, 10:09 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
crewl1's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 9,804
Most TC's do not have the electronics to adjust fstop reading from the lens, they just pass through whatever the lens says.
With Pentax the only exception is the Pentax HD 1.4 TC that does report correct aperture value and focal length.
So if I put my DFA100WR f2.8 lens on the HD TC and shoot wide open it will show as F4 @140mm.

QuoteOriginally posted by wissink Quote
I hope its okay that I ask this here. Reading this brought up a question I've been pondering. Using a 300 F4 lens and adding a 1.4x TC, the camera still says F4. Now I've read repeatedly that you lose a stop of light. Does this mean that it says F4 and mean F5.6? I'll step it down to 6.3, 7.1, or 8 for sharpness and contrast but are each of those numbers also a stop different? Can someone clarify this for me? Thanks

06-21-2015, 04:37 AM   #9
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 16,318
I have spent a long time looking for fast and light, and for me, this has ultimately resulted in the K300/4 and the 1.7x AF converter, which by the way does correctly pass through modified aperture information if used with an A series lens.

Any of the Pentax 300/4 lenses produces good results with thei converter, but it is effectively F6.9 wide open so yes, you need light, or a K5 to push tie ISO
06-21-2015, 08:18 AM   #10
Veteran Member
Kendigitize's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2013
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 324
I'll second the need for good technique. A have a Sears (Tokina) 300mm 5.6 prime lens that I've had ok results with when the light is just right. I have the Pentax REAR CONVERTER-A 2X-S, that I have tried with the 300mm before and the results were bad. Then I tried again yesterday with early morning sun and lighting the birds just right. And nailing the focus just right at 600mm. This was handheld and no editing or cropping. Not the sharpest photo, but I'm surprised there isn't as much CA and fringing and with a tripod I'm sure it would be a tad sharper. For a $25 mint condition 300mm lens and $30 mint rear converter.. I'm happy. This was F8, iso320, 1/125 with a K-30

Last edited by Kendigitize; 08-23-2015 at 04:31 AM.
06-21-2015, 03:26 PM   #11
Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 142
Original Poster
Thanks for the advice all. Much appreciated.

I've been using the Sigma 150-500 for a year now and feel I know it fairly well.

The way I shoot, some options for improving images aren't available or are limited. I don't go out to shoot birds, I shoot them while I'm out - while walking or camping outback or in the bush.

---------- Post added 06-22-15 at 08:33 AM ----------

PS, while reading around this matter I came across this site with some comparisons ... Pentax DA* 300 f4 | Lens Reviews | The Northcoast Photographer
06-21-2015, 04:11 PM   #12
Senior Member
devouges's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 266
I have used a 70-300mm fa-j for a few years and was happy. I upgraded to the 55-300mm and was happy and satisfied because my bird pictures were. in my opinion, much better.

I have done a LOT of reading and I am finally ordering the prime 300mm F4....... EVERYONE says it is a GREAT move. Just about everyone in the lens reviews say it is MUCH worth the upgrade.

I have ordered mine and I am SO anxious to get my hands on it...... where did I put those tranquilizer pills....
06-21-2015, 06:59 PM   #13
Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 142
Original Poster

After the advice here and more reading I pulled the trigger on a 2nd hand one from Adorama. It's not in brilliant condition but should functionally be OK. It'll be 5 weeks before it arrives and can be tested. May do some comparos.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
300mm, bird, camera, film, frame, iq, length, pentax, pentax help, photography, sigma, troubleshooting
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal length = min. shutter speed = ff crop? rzarector Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 14 03-21-2015 05:00 AM
Focal length vs Mpx: K-5IIs + DA21 or K-3 + DA15 and crop? carrrlangas Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 25 03-03-2014 12:32 PM
focal length on crop sensor question? littledrawe Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 14 09-28-2011 03:06 AM
macro shooting with small focal length lenses pete_pf Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 16 11-04-2008 04:35 AM
All pentax longer focal length primes sold out! roentarre General Talk 10 11-23-2006 04:13 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]