Originally posted by Not a Number Parts 106, 107, 108, 116 and S36 appear to be what you want. Too bad the list of part #s and names is missing.
I agree with you, those part numbers will be those connected (or disconnected
) to my problem...
116 is the O-ring seal, which came off (hope i store it in a safe place).
107, 108 and S36 are within the camera and should be united with the lever 106 which with it's stem is passing through a hole in de back of the camera.
It may be 108 is some sort of clip securing the stem of the lever.
Not nice the lever is pictured that unreal in the exploded view.
My guess it should look as a tiny and very short golfclub flattened and seen from aside: the part that hits the ball is the part on the back of the camera on an intact camera, the stick part is the stem that passes to the inside of the camera.
You don't believe the two parts 204 have a relation to the assy i am talking about??
Thank you!
rob
---------- Post added 01-02-16 at 03:25 AM ----------
Originally posted by dms (I have a K20d which is very similar.)
It seems to move through about 20 degrees arc, and not exactly a click, just a hard stop at on and off. And yes it should not move lightly--has a fair amount of resistance.
Thank you for your input on the theme!!
You do mean, on YOUR cam the lever is moving clock/anticlock wise in a ~20 degree arc, and does not click (or let you feel a sort of notch) but is making a sort of stiff movement (and is therefore 'secured in position' by it's stiffness??
(I have seen the K10D and K20D are identical related to the setup involved).
On my patient, the remains of the stem are moving a sort of 'wobbly' in the hole, this may be partially induced by the removed O-ring, which was quite loosely lying around in the recession (the orifice of the hole).
My hope for the case i cannot get a new part from Pentax or a repairer (which i believe with you will be the case... -not nice when people repair their own gear!!! - ), i will be able to glue the broken lever or cast a new one using the old one as a pattern.
Thank you again,
rob