Quality issues of the 16-50 2.8 SDM Problems solved? 16-50 an K5 Discontinued?

mee · 10-08-2016, 09:16 AM

Originally posted by biz-engineer

Ok ,thanks for the clarification. I originally thought the modification affects the camera firmware.

Would you please update your initial post in this thread as the information you provided has been discredited?

biz-engineer · 10-08-2016, 09:21 AM

Originally posted by mee

Would you please update your initial post in this thread as the information you provided has been discredited?

Yes i could, but I can't change the quotes. If I change my initial comment, the thread is not understandable anymore.

mee · 10-08-2016, 10:12 AM

Originally posted by biz-engineer

Yes i could, but I can't change the quotes. If I change my initial comment, the thread is not understandable anymore.

Could just put an addition at the bottom of your post that the K-3 is not an issue with an already screw-drive updated SDM lens.

biz-engineer · 10-08-2016, 11:12 AM

The K-3 is not an issue with an already screw-drive updated SDM lens.

**UncleVanya** · 10-08-2016, 11:12 AM

Originally posted by biz-engineer

Yes i could, but I can't change the quotes. If I change my initial comment, the thread is not understandable anymore.

I do it all the time - putting my foot in my mouth means going back and making changes. What I do is post in my original:

EDIT: I have learned this... xyz something something something. So this is no longer correct.

That's really all there is to it. Then if someone comes along and reads it.

biz-engineer · 10-08-2016, 11:24 AM

Originally posted by UncleVanya

EDIT: I have learned this... xyz something something something. So this is no longer correct. That's really all there is to it. Then if someone comes along and reads it.

That's what I did.
"
Originally posted by biz-engineer

Ok ,thanks for the clarification. I originally thought the modification affects the camera firmware."

Happy ?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New version of the DA*16-50 2.8?	TroutHunterJohn	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	28	07-06-2015 03:09 PM
For Sale - Sold: Great sale-Zeiss 25/2.8, 77/1.8, 43/1.9, 60-250/4, 50-135/2.8, 16-50/2.8 PRICE DROP	kindakaa	Sold Items	22	12-06-2014 01:46 AM
DA* 16-50 SDM problems...	MikeH	Pentax SLR Lens Discussion	29	02-05-2014 09:29 PM
For Sale - Sold: K-5, 16-50,50-135,65-250, Sigma 17-50, 50 1.4, 50 1.8, Tamron 90 2.8, Flashes	virarfast	Sold Items	8	04-04-2013 02:30 PM

10-08-2016, 09:16 AM	#16
mee Veteran Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 7,403	Originally posted by biz-engineer Ok ,thanks for the clarification. I originally thought the modification affects the camera firmware. Would you please update your initial post in this thread as the information you provided has been discredited?

10-08-2016, 09:21 AM	#17
biz-engineer Pentaxian Join Date: Feb 2015 Photos: Gallery Posts: 12,227	Originally posted by mee Would you please update your initial post in this thread as the information you provided has been discredited? Yes i could, but I can't change the quotes. If I change my initial comment, the thread is not understandable anymore.

10-08-2016, 10:12 AM	#18
mee Veteran Member Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 7,403	Originally posted by biz-engineer Yes i could, but I can't change the quotes. If I change my initial comment, the thread is not understandable anymore. Could just put an addition at the bottom of your post that the K-3 is not an issue with an already screw-drive updated SDM lens.

10-08-2016, 11:12 AM	#19
biz-engineer Pentaxian Join Date: Feb 2015 Photos: Gallery Posts: 12,227	The K-3 is not an issue with an already screw-drive updated SDM lens.

10-08-2016, 11:12 AM	#20
UncleVanya Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2014 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 28,398	Originally posted by biz-engineer Yes i could, but I can't change the quotes. If I change my initial comment, the thread is not understandable anymore. I do it all the time - putting my foot in my mouth means going back and making changes. What I do is post in my original: EDIT: I have learned this... xyz something something something. So this is no longer correct. That's really all there is to it. Then if someone comes along and reads it.

10-08-2016, 11:24 AM	#21
biz-engineer Pentaxian Join Date: Feb 2015 Photos: Gallery Posts: 12,227	Originally posted by UncleVanya EDIT: I have learned this... xyz something something something. So this is no longer correct. That's really all there is to it. Then if someone comes along and reads it. That's what I did. " Originally posted by biz-engineer Ok ,thanks for the clarification. I originally thought the modification affects the camera firmware." Happy ?

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search