Originally posted by roxiemyhorse Thanks Des! I think I am starting to lean towards the KP, since it is more durable for not that much more money. Also starting with the 18-135. Then practice for awhile and see what I want for lenses after that. We will be in NYC for Astros/Yankees game in June, so I am thinking of stopping in at B&H to chat with someone there about lenses as well. I don't want to nickle and dime myself with lenses, I want to get good ones.
My goal is to have a wide angle that I am proficient enough with to be able to get some decent photos at the beginning of December at Petrified Forest, Canyon de Chelly, Monument Valley, Hunts Mesa and Arches NP.
Regarding the wide angle, any of the options mentioned is good. The question is which one suits you.
I've had the Pentax DA 12-24 for some years and it has given me some of my favourite images:
But it's a little bulky and often gets left behind on a walk, so I recently got the DA 15 f4 Limited, which is very pocketable. I'm loving it too. The point is that there's a case for either zoom or prime (I'm just using these ones as examples), depending on how you want to use it.
If you develop an interest in astrophotography, that would point you to a wide lens with a wider maximum aperture (e.g. f2.8). But for landscapes you will generally be shooting at f6.3, f8 or f11, so it doesn't matter that the maximum aperture is only f4 or slower.
The one thing to note about ultrawide angle (UWA) lenses is that you don't use it just to stand at a lookout and get everything in one shot. You might as well use your phone for that. Effective use of UWA means learning new skills about composition and shooting angles. There are plenty of good online tutorials about this. You should also aim to use a tripod as much as possible, not only for the steadiness but also for the angles.
One reason I suggested waiting a little before getting the UWA lens is that it will be easier to work on those skills once you have become familiar with the basics: controls and features on the camera, focusing effectively, the exposure triangle (aperture, shutter speed and ISO), hyperfocal distance, etc.
Another way to get wide field of view images without a UWA lens is to take a series of overlapping photos in a panning motion (preferably on a tripod) and stitch them together with software. There are free stitching programs that do this effectively, like
Microsoft Image Composite Editor You can use any focal length for the images to stitch. The main thing is to ensure that the shots to be stitched are sharp from edge to edge and use the same aperture, focus distance and white balance. For examples, see this thread:
Panorama-orama - Post your Panos - PentaxForums.com Originally posted by roxiemyhorse I will be upgrading to an ipad Pro as well...are there programs that work with ipad pro for processing RAW photos?
Can't help with that one. All I'd say is that editing on a small screen is much more difficult - in a pinch maybe, but using a big monitor is better. Maybe you can output to a big screen from the ipad?
Last edited by Des; 02-22-2019 at 01:27 PM.