Originally posted by sailom My process has been to, ''focus'' on the subject and then set the f-stop to match the, ''needle'' in the middle as highlighted. The camera itself has been set to Automatic with the exposure dial as 1x. I believe the error on my part being that I was treating the meter as an, ''exposure needle'' than a guide for shutter speed. I believe that may be the cause of the blurriness in some images as lower the number?
Welcome to the world of the "exposure triangle". Correct exposure* is usually indicated by by center-ing the needle as you have done. But remember that exposure is influenced by three things:
1 The film sensitivity
2 shutter speed
3 aperture.
If you use a wider aperture, you allow more light through the lens and you need a faster shutter speed to compensate. If you use a narrower aperture you allow less light through the lens and the camera needs a slower shutter speed. If the shutter speed is 1/30 or below you may need to use a tripod in order to prevent camera shake affecting your images. You will still see motion blur from faster moving objects. There is no way round this other than using a wider aperture (less depth of field) or a faster ISO film.
* "correct exposure will not always be correct. High contrast scenes can "fool" the meter. In your second image I imagine that the bright sun reflected off the white stonework on the left fooled your meter into thinking that the entire image was brighter than it was. therefore you have underexposed areas to the centre/right of the image. There is no magic solution to this. You can bracket the exposures or apply compensation to brighten the image, but you risk burning the bright areas on the left.
No-one said photography was easy