Originally posted by tuco The leaf shutter is triggered by body. The extension tube just extends that level. It's going to trip the lens or not. Where and how that can lock up the mirror is beyond me.
The statement published by Pentax in their own instructions was made clear earlier.
Mirror lock-up cannot be used in leaf shutter mode with the 165mmLS lens.
How a user perceives the mechanical coupling between the lens and the 6x7 / 67 body, or the lens, converter and camera body does not change, dilute or dispose of long-standing, published warnings -- warnings that, yes, people have cheerfully challenged, up to the point where an unexpected fault occurs and the lens enters an unrecoverable state. A few of these people (beginners striding out with the 67 and 165LS for the first time) have pleaded ignorance in unrolling their misery to me personally in correspondence. I derive great joy from writing a treatise on respect for engineers, and I write that treatise with a whip.
I confidently side with Phil's observation that Pentax would have carried out a lot of testing on what happens, when, how and why before the lens was released to the market. You do know that the
90mm LS is able to be used in leaf shutter mode with the mirror lock-up functional. An examination of the internal arrangement of leaf shutter and attendant mechanisms compared to the more generously allowable 90mm may prove a revelation.
Here's an interesting parallel: would you actually think the meter coupling chain on TTL prism-equipped 67 bodies 'just will not break' if you removed/replaced the lens and TTL prism in any order you please, other than the order Pentax specifically recommended...?