Originally posted by Laci.4400
This Vorsatz bellows is really simple. There’s no cable release socket or anything. Just the bellows, the mount and the rail. But I mounted the lens and I can focus by opening the aperture and then stop it down in manual mode. No big issue. I won’t be able to determine the dof and haven’t tried it with ttl yet so I can comment on this, but I’ll need a dedicated macro lens or a enlarging lens as the Takumar 55mm f1.8 failed at this extreme close up. The edges were blurred of course.
The images of a Vosatz bellows that I was looking at, recommended above by Laci.4400, must be a different model from yours. Almost all lenses not specifically designed to operate in the deep-macro range (1:1 and greater magnification) function better (=give better IQ) when reverse mounted. This is because typical lenses are designed for a lens-to-subject distance that is greater than the lens-to-film/sensor distance. On a bellows, the lens-to-subject distance is typically less than the lens-to-film/sensor distance. (the crossover for distances takes place at 1:1 reproduction ratio where the two distances are equal). Reversing rings for M42 to filter thread are inexpensive. You might try such a ring with your 55mm f1.8 before purchasing a new lens. If you cannot locate one with the correct filter thread for a lens you want to use, there are always stepping rings. For bellows use only, an enlarger lens is commonly better than a typical camera lens, I use a 50mm f2.8 Componon in reversed position for some deep macro imaging. A much less expensive enlarging lens that works well is the 50mm f2.8 Nikkor, generally available on EBAY. The 50mm f4 Nikkor DOES NOT WORK WELL. A caveat: not all enlarging lenses have filter threads, and on those that do, the thread size is small which means using a stepping ring to attach to a reversing ring (that's what I do with the Componon). Even used in non-reversed position, a good enlarging lens will outperform most normal FL camera lenses used in normal or reversed position (as always, there are exceptions - the 28mm f3.5 Takumar apparently works extremely well in reversed orientation on a bellows). If you use an enlarging lens in normal orientation on the bellows, you will need an M42 to M39 ("Leica thread") adapter. Most short FL enlarging lenses (= 100mm or less) have an M39 thread.
more and more information
1) enlarging lenses are near "perfect" = their best IQ is either wide open or at most one stop down. IQ degradation from diffraction becomes visible @ f5.6 on almost any/all enlarging lenses.
2) In deep macro range, DOF is extremely shallow and gains in DOF by stopping down are also very small. Even at a nominal (as marked on the lens) f16 DOF is painfully small for photographing something like the head of an insect, and that incremental gain in DOF will come with considerable loss of IQ caused by diffraction.
3) because of the DOF problem. it is really useful/important/even necessary to use focus stacking for deep macro. For a deep macro shot of part of a penny, the "UM" only letters from E PLURIBUS UNUM, I had to use a stack of 10 images files to get sharp focus from the top surface of the letters to their base using a NIKON 4X APO microscope objective.
There's an awful lot to be known about working in the deep macro range. I have some experience, but there are other Pentaxians who have far more.