Originally posted by dwchambers Just a quick update: I acquired a ZX-60 and a 28-90 to further test the 43mm. The 43mm failed to work correctly on the ZX-60 (the middle aperture values were still registering as A with the camera), and the 28-90 worked correctly on both the ZX-60 and the ZX-5N.
So it's definitely some issue internal to the lens. I've initiated a return and will be back looking for a working 43mm now!!
Thanks for talking this through, folks.
Welcome to the forum. I was about to say the behavior of the FA 43mm Limited looks suspect, since the camera works normally with the zoom lens, but then you discovered that was definitely the case. When you acquire a perfectly fine copy of the FA 43mm LTD lens, it is an exceptional performer, and is a good match with this camera. The ZX-5n has a better VF than the ZX-60, and it has ready access to a full choice of metering patterns, including spot metering. But it does require a lens having an aperture ring to choose your own aperture- there is no on-body control for this.
The "crippled" lens-use design pschlute refers to, means that camera cannot function in setting aperture with a lens having an aperture ring but no auto ("A") setting on the lens- that is, aperture must only be set using the body's aperture control- the exact opposite of the ZX-5n design. This is substantially ""crippling" when it comes to using older manual-focus lenses not having an "A" setting on the aperture ring. A better alternative than the ZX-60 (which I think is of the "crippled" design) is the ZX-L which has full versatility. It's VF is not quite the quality as the ZX-5n, but it has on-body aperture control plus it can use an aperture ring as well, if needed. Some lenses, even some excellent ones of a later design have no aperture ring, so in that regard the ZX-5n is a "crippled" design of the opposite type (as is the higher-class MZ-S). And the ZX-L (as well as the very large, excellent PZ-1p) can switch instantly between aperture ring use or on-body electronic aperture control without any adjustment. It also has some other advancements, including for flash use.
One advantage of having on-body electronic aperture adjustment as opposed to on-lens aperture ring adjustment is when using a variable-aperture zoom lens (which most are), your chosen aperture will remain as you have set it even when zooming through the zoom range, as long as your choice is an aperture no larger than the maximum at any point of that zoom range. For example, a zoom lens variable of f/3.5-5.6 and you say select f/5.6 on your ZX-5n when the lens is at its shorter end where it is not wide open at that aperture, then you zoom the lens to a longer focal length enough for its variable aperture to kick in so it becomes perhaps f/8. If you select f/8, it will change to f/9.5, f/11 etc as you zoom longer. With an electronic control, the control will compensate for that lens's variable aperture, keeping it to your setting, as long as that setting is not wider than the maximum for the lens.
The ZX-L and ZX-5n were my two compact, lightweight models during the late film era, while my more developed but weightier models were the MZ-S (needs aperture ring like the ZX-5n but is of pro-style metal construction and has other pro features- mirror lockup etc), and the much larger, full-featured, very versatile PZ-1p.