Originally posted by maxgroebel Hi,
Stupid Queston #2: I bought my K3II about three years ago, but we have never become friends. I was rather happy with my old K20D, and the only reason I bought it was that I wanted a video capability, which the K3II has. But I find that pictures are often grey and drab, in particular in low light. (Could be the lenses of course, but should they be better on K20D?). There is often some haze (could be the lenses of course). I have posted a couple of questions about that in the past. question The contrast is worse, and the colours are generally less vivid, even if I change the colour scheme (normally landscape). And then it is easy to graze the buttons and change the colour scheme unintentionally. So, I sometimes feel I should get rid of the K3II and get another camera. Question is: Which one?
I have never used the GPS, I rarely need flash, built in or otherwise.
Max .
That is strange, my experience with the K-3 has been pretty much the opposite. That said, your experience is your experience and not mine
.
Probably the best advice I can give is to shoot RAW (DNG or PEF). That will free you from the camera's JPEG processing and allow full control of managing colors and curves. A second hint might be to tell the camera to not remember its custom image setting from one session to the next. Yes, those only apply to in-camera JPEG, but they do affect the previews we see on the rear LCD and with many software image browsers. (menu --> Rec Mode 4 --> Memory).
Oh...and yes...It could be your selection of lenses. What are you using?
Steve