I don't use the scene modes either, but for someone that isn't comfortable beyond the basics of a point and shoot, the k2000 would ease the transaction more so than the k20D, and still offer more than ample opportunity to learn the skils and techinical aspects of DSLR shooting. But, anyone with the desire to learn either camera should be able to do so.
I spent a week shooting with the K20d. Yep, tons of features. It also was not nearly as comfortable for me to grip with my smaller hands compared to the k2000. The very conservative metering of the K20d did sort of bug me, but that wasn't the "deal breaker".
The viewfinder on the K2000 is big and bright enough for me. Same VF as the K200D. I use the digital preview for checking dof and what not.
Anyhow, for me personally, the best camera wasn't the K20D. Not because it isn't a nice camera, but because I prefered the fit of the K2000 and I will be able to use the extra $230 I didn't spend on the K20D body toward a DA40 lens and a dedicated flash.
For the next person, the K20D may indeed be the better choice. I reccomended the k2000 for the orginal poster who has not ventured beyond the full auto mode of his/her point and shoot camera but wants to dive into a DSLR. The k2000 may not have some of the more advanced feaures of the K20D, but it is designed to nicely bridge the jump from point and shoot to DSLR more so than the K20D.
The bottom line is that either camera should work nicely for them and in the end, they will have to choose their own favorite flavor of Pentax DSLR.
Last edited by Sew-Classic; 07-18-2009 at 04:52 AM.