Originally posted by LeoTaylor My previous post mentions a used istD being a good IR camera. If you read my new post on thread "Infrared With The *ist D" I tested an istD, K100D, and modified K110D. To my surprise the istD and K100D came out roughly equal with a Hoya R72 filter. This contradicts what I and other have been saying.
I have found my *ist D to be similar in IR sensitivity to the *ist DS, which is to mean pretty good.
Comparing them to a K110 that has the IR cut filter removed doesn't say much - every digital SLR is a great IR dSLR with the cut filter removed. The *ist D/DS and K100/110 are good for IR because the IR cut filter is weak, and you can use it unmodified with decent results handheld. The K10D has a much stronger IR cut filter (I'm assuming) and can't be used handheld at any ISO.