Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
08-05-2010, 07:56 PM   #1
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2010
Location: long island
Posts: 135
what is the best way to transfer pictures to a computer?

Hi guys,

just want to ask what the best way is... to directly use a cardreader or connect the camera to the computer via USB?

I ask because usually I use the built-in cardreader of my computer directly, but I am afraid this is a bad way because inserting and ejecting the card too many times may harm the card and the camera's cardreader.

so what do you think? thanks!

08-05-2010, 08:03 PM   #2
Community Manager
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 22,733
Shang, it's easier and quicker to download directly from card to computer.
As long as you're careful when inserting and removing the card, there should be no appreciable damage done to the card.

There will, however, inevitably be damage done to the camera's USB port by virtue of repeated connecting and disconnecting the cable on the flimsy port. So I'm of the mind that the computer's SD card reader is the way to go. But if you feel it's just too tight and rough on the card, you can always get an SD card reader that usually allows the SD card to fit quite freely and transfer data effectively.
08-05-2010, 08:07 PM   #3
Site Supporter
Site Supporter

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Boston MA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 280
I used to plug the USB cable into my camera and read from my camera, but found it easier to take the card out and use the card reader. Been doing this for years and have not had a problem.
08-05-2010, 08:28 PM   #4
Wheatfield's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The wheatfields of Canada
Photos: Albums
Posts: 10,699
One way you are wearing out the card slot, the other way you are risking bending a pin.
It's better to eject the card because that is the only way to clean any oxidization that might form between the camera and card.
The card reader is faster, and probably more reliable.
My vote goes to eject the card and use a reader.
And that's what I do.

08-06-2010, 12:18 PM   #5
Moderator PEG Judges
Loyal Site Supporter
Kerrowdown's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Highlands of Scotland.
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 38,095
Another vote for card out the camera and I'm lucky enough to to have a card reader built into the laptop, just an SD slot no cables or USB involved, Adobe Bridge does the rest.
08-06-2010, 12:23 PM   #6
KxBlaze's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: California
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,602
+1 for card directly in computer. This will also save the battery of the camera and is also faster.
08-06-2010, 12:38 PM   #7
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Nowhere Matt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nowhere Land
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,330
Via osmosis? Maybe?
08-06-2010, 02:14 PM   #8
Veteran Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Madison, Wis., USA
Posts: 1,510
Oddly enough, I experimented two weeks ago with my new Asus desktop and its internal SDHC reader using a SanDisk Extreme III 8 GB card with a bunch of raw + JPEG.

Compared the internal reader to a small SanDisk Micromate reader going through a cheap Office Depot laptop USB hub.

Wrote the same set of about 3 GB of image files from the same card to the computer's HDD.

Read was faster with the SanDisk reader than with the internal reader. Entirely unexpected.

I've never used USB cable directly to computer from a camera. It's OK to damage or short a card or a card reader. No so good to damage the K-7. I'm not sure that it's a big risk but I sleep a bit better.

08-06-2010, 03:25 PM   #9
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Netherlands
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 148
I also think the wheater sealing on the SD card is much better and much less easyer worn than that of the USB port.
08-06-2010, 08:05 PM   #10
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Albums
Posts: 230
using a card reader
08-06-2010, 09:07 PM   #11
Junior Member
Xlusionist's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 27
card reader... don't see another better way...
08-06-2010, 09:36 PM   #12
Senior Member

Join Date: May 2010
Location: long island
Posts: 135
Original Poster
thanks guys! will continue using my laptop cardreader
08-06-2010, 11:25 PM   #13
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,264
Ah, moving images into a computer... it's evolved. Back in the late 80s / early-to-mid 90's, it meant using a hand scanner (because flatbed scanners were nonexistant-to-prohibitively-expensive). Then I advanced to webcams (plugged into RS-232 serial ports) and then a parallel-port frame-grabber -- feed video in, grab a frame every now and then, etc. Then a standalone video CD player-burner -- feed video in, burn a CD, load into computer, grab EVERY frame. Cowabunga!

Then came my first digicam, a 1mpx Sony DSC-P20 (which I still use) and a matching computer, a tiny Sony Vaio sub-notebook, both with MagicGate MemStick slots. Eureka! Fill the stick (128mb max), move it to computer, empty it, repeat endlessly. But newer cameras used newer bigger sticks -- and so I got my first USB cardreader. I've used such ever since.

Fast-forward to more cameras and devices, more card formats: MemStickPro, SmartMedia, SDxx, Xd. My current reader (SanDisk ImageMate 12-in-1) handles bookoo formats. BUT... when I travel with yet another tiny Vaio sub-notebook, that reader stays home. My Transcend 16mb SD card came with a tiny USB plug-in reader, and my Sony and Oly digicams just get USB cables plugged into them. The USB cable is pokey-slow, but it works.

So, the answer: card-readers rock. (Except the cheap one that reformatted cards after every transfer.) But USB cables are a good backup. Whatever it takes, eh? I suppose the next step is SD-WiFi. Maybe...
08-07-2010, 01:07 AM   #14
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Manila
Photos: Albums
Posts: 230
wireless transfer is going to be next
something faster than bluetooth..

probably wifi
08-07-2010, 01:50 AM   #15
Veteran Member

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Budapest
Posts: 821
QuoteOriginally posted by Ash Quote
There will, however, inevitably be damage done to the camera's USB port by virtue of repeated connecting and disconnecting the cable on the flimsy port.
Actually the SD card locking mechanism is more fragile than the USB port. Very frequent card changes can wear it out fast and unfortunately then the entire card reader has to be replaced (not just the locking mechanism) due to its construction. In the service center we've seen so many worn out SD card units from PDAs, cameras, etc...

With normal, average usage you probably replace the cam sooner than the locking mechanism or the USB port wearing out. It's an issue only with very frequent usage.

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, card, computer, dslr, photography, transfer pictures
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do you copy/transfer files to computer? RolloR Pentax DSLR Discussion 42 05-31-2010 09:55 AM
transfer warranties? FHPhotographer Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 1 03-09-2009 07:39 PM
File transfer jdg Photographic Technique 17 11-19-2008 10:03 PM
pc transfer sketchin13 Photographic Technique 0 05-31-2007 08:35 PM
pictures to computer AmandaJL Pentax DSLR Discussion 12 01-02-2007 04:39 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:33 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]