Originally posted by Kryscendo With some marketing money- Pentax can carve out a nice niche. I just worry that people think "Oh, this $600 Nikon is 'Professional'" and if they are going to go professional, they may as well go Nikon. Yes, people think this. If they want a particular camera, I'll sell it to them, but for the people who want fun filters, speedy firmware, and ease of use, Pentax is more than a viable option.
Now for students looking for semi-pro equipment, it's harder. Sure there is the K-5, but most students I sell too look for the D700 and 5DMKII, only a few look for the updates (as they are so expensive).
I find it strange that people find it strange to choose what they think is a more "professional" camera setup. Many of my photography mentors have stressed this as a point: if the clients don't respect you as "the photographer," they'll think of you as just another "guy with a camera." If you carry around a battery grip (or, back then, a winder motorized drive system), a flash bracket, and a serious zoom lens,it makes you look professional. It's unfortunate that the image of a photographer has become so bound up with the camera's brand, but that's to be expected as companies begin to appeal to different (new) demographics.
I don't buy any of these approaches to "appearing professional," and the notion itself is a strange one in the first place. It's better to win the client's respect by being knowledgable about our craft in consultations, by being respectful to the client at the gig, by shooting our subjects with confidence and competence, and by producing the best images possible. (; However, I can see
why a person would try to buy the camera that will give them the best chance at success—especially when so many professionals use the D700 or 5Dii. None of this is crazy or surprising.