Originally posted by Dartmoor Dave But then I stopped myself and thought about it for a moment, and then I told her to do this instead: to make a shortlist of cameras in her price range from all the different manufacturers, then to go on Flickr and look at lots of different photos taken by those exact cameras. I told her to buy the camera that produces photographs that most closely match the way she sees things in her mind's eye.
That's the advice I would give for photographers interested in getting a new lens, but for cameras, I think I would adopt a different approach. It's a good idea to try to help people buy the camera that best fits their need, which may or may not be Pentax. It's also very difficult for people just starting out to know what sort of camera that will best fit their needs. But you can fill people in on the strengths and weaknesses of each brand. I would contend that Pentax makes better entry level cameras than Canikon (this has long been true), tends to make better APS-C lenses, and makes a better "field" APS-C DSLR, better ergonomics, more WR options at better prices, IBIS, star tracking via GPS unit, etc. Canikon makes better sports cameras, better "system" cameras, better FF stuff with a lot more choices, better flash system, more specialty lenses, etc. With cameras, I suspect it's best to just give people more information from which to make a decision. You simply don't want them to make Canikon the default choice, when they may in fact be better off with Pentax.