Originally posted by Photos-by-Chas True, there are many people, usually younger, who rely on cell phones rather than a MILC or DSLR. I have a son who is a Millennial and he depends on his cell phone for almost everything, internet, photos, clock/watch, and even some of his daily work, though for work he does have a laptop computer he uses. He has a wonderful eye for composition, color, poses, and uses no post processing of any kind.
I probably take photos of many more scenes/subjects with my iPhone than with my DSLRs. With my DSLRs, I do a lot of bracketing of the same scene/subject, so I may end up taking many more DSLR photos overall -- but I'll have many more photos of different scenes/subjects with my iPhone, simply because it's with me wherever I go. With my DSLRs, I'm usually taking specific time and effort to using them (and taking them with me somewhere, if away from home), so much more thought goes into using them, and I'm usually much more focused on getting the photo correct. Thus, there are lots of photos that I'd have missed in the past (10+ years ago) that I would now take because my iPhone is always with me.
---------- Post added 05-08-21 at 11:50 AM ----------
Originally posted by Photos-by-Chas I think it is a stretch to compare cameras to automobiles.
My point was concerning the business model. And it's not a stretch to say that Pentax cameras and Porsches are similar in that they are both much more money than the average person would pay for a camera or a car, and they are relatively uncommon in the world compared to other cameras/cars. The point is that Porsche was struggling financially, as Pentax ostensibly is also, and both are owned by much larger parent companies. Porsche found a way out of its existential crisis by producing cheaper vehicles that more people would want to buy, vs. their more elite and expensive vehicles that relatively few people will ever consider.