It is very funny to hear , and read in reviews, that Nikon en Canon have more lenses. So you might be better off with them.
But I always wonder, how many lenses do you need ( Ok, I won't quote how many I actually have). When shooting film, 99% of my pics were made with a 50mm lens, for portraits I took a 135, for sports a 400 and sometimes when I fellt a bit artistici I took the 20mm
No in Digital I still have the 400 for surfing, I have the 16-45 as standard lens and 28-105 to back it up for portraits.And I just got a 80-200mm (it came with a MZ-M and 35-80 lens, which all together cost me just 45 euros) which will only be used for sports (of my kids)
I am saving up for the 40mm, and from then on it most likely will be the lens that will be on my camera for 99% of the time.
Unless you need specialist lenses, any of the brands is good (well, pentax is the best right
)
And I ones heard from a photographer, that the majority of pictures that won contests were made with K1000's