Originally posted by Deniz I've been a proud Pentaxian for a year now. At the very first moment I saw what my Pentax can do, I knew I made the right decision. The K-x was, and still is, better than any camera in it's range. But, as it's written on the review something's just missing. I know the Pentax cameras are usally relativly small and it seems to be that this is going on forever but, I personally beileve that there should be a line between being compact and being pro or semi-pro. And, yes, this is all there is. I just can't get the feeling from the K-x.
Now, the K-5 is out. Yet another superb but small camera and with a price you can buy a Canon 7D instead, well, let's say I'm having a serious dilemma for my future investments..
P.S: Actually there is one more issue. Why the hell Pentax don't/wouldn't produce a f1.8/1.7 50mm lens with a reasonable price!
I'm almost a 1 year old Pentax user as well with the K-x also being my first DSLR. I think you have a valid point in mentioning the fact there is no cheap 50mm from Pentax like there is from Canon or Nikon. I also agree it's a lot more work in trying to find used alternatives or older glass. Hell, some of the A and F lenses are fetching ridiculously high prices in the aftermarket.
Anyhow, it's disappointing, but it doesn't stop me from shooting or enjoying other glass. I've since skipped out on the idea of getting a 50mm and instead now own the DA 40, 70, and DFA 100mm WR (amongst others I won't mention). And you know what? I don't really miss not have a fast 50. With what I now have invested in glass, I'd take a K-5 any day of the week over a 7D.