Originally posted by Abstract
That site seems to me, to be a perfect example of the old dictum (sometimes attributed to Mark Twain), that "there are lies, DAMNED LIES, and STATISTICS!!
With only 3 dead cameras, the statistics mean nothing. We don't even know that it was the shutter that died. If could have been the internal electronics. Even if it was the shutter, I'm sure that you could find more than three cameras that were dead, straight out of the box. Does that prove that all Pentax cameras are DOA? Of course not.
Seriously, it IS a good example of why everyone should have some exposure to statistics in high school. Statistics are an extremely useful tool, IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE READING. Too many people create statistics like that site, with no real understanding, and then try to use it to "prove" something. Many readers, equally ignorant of statistics (and its limitations), believe the "proof". After all, numbers don't lie!