Originally posted by Lowell Goudge While I could be wrong, it almost seems like people throw out reasons that they think justify FF and keep throwing them out there as each one is successively knocked down
You mean as in, Homo sapiens is a
rationalizing (not
rational) animal? Oh yeah!
I've learned not to try rationalizing too much. "Honey, I *need* that Nokton! It's so fast!" just doesn't work anymore. Since I'm not in business, there's no need, only desire, no matter what spin (rationalization) I try to apply. "But I
need the DOF! It's so thin!" So use a 135/2.5. "But I
need the low-light capability! Nothing else will do!" So use flash or tripod. "But I
need the resolution! Not enough megapickles!" So shoot at ISO 100, duh. Or use the ZX-M. "But I
need the wideness!" Not after getting a 10-24, nope. "But I
need that FF body -- I feel emasculated with only this K20D!" So snort some Viagara. Whatever.
If I *could* rationalize my way into a FF body, which would it be? My cheap sub to PopPhoto just started and I leaf through the section THE GUIDE * CAMERAS and I see exactly two (2) FF's with in-body stabilization: Sony A900 (US$2.7k) and A850 (US$2k). Since I'm not in business, I'll have to rob a few minimarts to get cash for either. All the rationalization in the world won't bump my budget. Bother.