Originally posted by jlaubza The K7 has more bells and whistles
FACT: The K-7 features are not all bells and whistles. Personally I do not want to use a camera without:
1. Individual AF adjust for lenses. This is essential or shots
will be out of focus... much more damaging to an image than a tad more noise. My K-x needs completely different focus adjustments for all my common lenses, and each one requires a trip to a debug menu... impractical.
2. A clear Pentaprism viewfinder so that manual focusing is no longer a crap shoot. Also helps with composing.
3. Two control wheels for much better ergonomics. I don't use the camera as a point'n'shoot and so need direct and instant access to parameters.
4. Solid build (weather-sealing a bonus) so I am confident the camera won't glitch on a job. The K-x is simply not built to the same tolerances.
The above reasons are why I prefer my K20D to my K-x, which I will sell just as soon as I can afford to upgrade it to a better body. The K-7 has even further benefits I would love to have -- quiet shutter, improved AF. Compared to all of these a bit more noise in high ISO (a situation I find myself in frequently shooting events, BTW).
Saying these features are all "bells and whistles" is simply misleading.