Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
12-21-2007, 08:44 PM   #16
Veteran Member
Duck Dodgers's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: in the 24½th Century!
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 439
QuoteOriginally posted by Miserere Quote
I'm looking at my EXIF data in Adobe Bridge, but can't find this revision data. Does it matter what softwaree you use to access the EXIF file?
Yes. I believe a couple of Pentaxians supplied the needed "decryption" of K10D fields for both Photo ME and Exiftool.

12-22-2007, 01:20 AM   #17
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
Posts: 426
QuoteOriginally posted by Duck Dodgers Quote
When did 2.2 come out? According to Exiftool, my K10D's revision is 2.1, with a manufacture date of 2007:08:01. If all the date fields have the same format, that's August 1st.
Mine's 20070517, already rev. 2.1.
12-22-2007, 05:59 AM   #18
Senior Member




Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 239
PhotoME is indeed an interesting program... Though i have GX-10, not K10D. But it still identifies correctlym seems like i have 1.6 version, manufactured on 19 of March 2007. Well, I guess I dont have the "advanced" one, but I am still happy with it lol.
12-22-2007, 09:48 AM   #19
Inactive Account




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 93
I checked mine and it says version 1.3....so what does this really mean?

12-22-2007, 11:22 AM   #20
Senior Member
ricosuave's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NC
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 299
version 2.21
july '07.
12-22-2007, 12:10 PM   #21
Veteran Member
mattdm's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,964
QuoteOriginally posted by harv3589 Quote
I checked mine and it says version 1.3....so what does this really mean?
Probably that means you're looking at the firmware version, not the model revision.

Mine is:

Manufacture Date : 2007:07:24
Model Revision : 2.1
Internal Serial Number : 4376974
12-22-2007, 01:52 PM   #22
Veteran Member
RBellavance's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Near Montréal, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,716
Mine is revision 1.1, manufactured on 2006:10:28.

I can't read russian, can anyone shed some light on this ?
12-22-2007, 02:08 PM   #23
New Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 2
Hey guys,

my K10D is Rev. 2.1 but manufactured in Nov. 2007!? 0.5 revisions in about one month? Hmm...

12-22-2007, 03:19 PM   #24
Junior Member
Jacob's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cologne
Posts: 30
model revision 1.2 from 20061208 (8 December 2006)
12-22-2007, 04:27 PM   #25
Busiko
Guest




Pre Historic K10D

Hi folks. It took a while but now I can figure it out. After installing PhotoMe I can confirm that my K10D is pre production sample. As per Exif data:
"
Pentax Model: K10D
Manufacture Date: 20051206
Model Revision: 1.5
Internal Serial Number: 5069598
Battery Kind: 2
Battery States: Body Battery: Full; Grip Battery: Missing "

I don't mind as long as the Warranty is valid.

How lucky I am!!!

Season's greetings
Rui

Last edited by Busiko; 12-22-2007 at 04:33 PM.
12-22-2007, 06:53 PM   #26
Veteran Member
Stratman's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: St Louis, Missouri U S A
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,464
I guess I have a noisy one

12-22-2007, 09:30 PM   #27
Forum Member
MNCurt-K10D's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 98
Even more 'pre-historic'!

Manufacture Date :20051201
Model Revision: 1.5
Internal Serial Number: 5097223

Purchased May 2007 from B&H...
12-22-2007, 10:21 PM   #28
Forum Member
MNCurt-K10D's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 98
Is PhotoME Manuf Date mis-interpreted?

I asked about the Manuf. Data out of PhotoME earlier here, and a few responders suggested that the EXIF data was being incorrectly presented as a manufacturing date, etc. Can anyone confirm or refute the correctness of the PhotoME interpretation? Based on the data presented just in this thread, things do look a little suspect:

Manuf Date Rev Internal SN
20051201 1.5 5097223
20051206 1.5 5069598
20061028 1.1
20061208 1.2
20070317 2.1
20070517 2.1
20070701 2.21
20070724 2.1 4376974
20070801 2.1
20070803 2.1
20071024 2.1 4576153
20071101 2.1
12-22-2007, 10:44 PM   #29
Inactive Account




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 93
Manufacture date 2006/12/10
Model Revision 1.2
Internal Serial Number 5129155

Still not sure what that would mean...does anyone see a difference compared to the newer Revision ones?
12-23-2007, 12:21 AM   #30
Veteran Member




Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 313
QuoteOriginally posted by ogl Quote
My mistake - 2.2 and higher. For K10D GP revision 2.1 and higher.
If those are right out of the camera, it looks like they improved what I've been annoying the fanboys about with my posts - CHROMA NOISE.

Good going Pentax. Hopefully, by some doubtful miracle, the substance of the camera revision is accomplishable by firmware update for cameras earlier than 2.2. Mine is 1.2.

The Nucore ADC front ends, and Fujitsu backend are supposed to have abilities to be tweaked. Maybe they made an official decision to do this, and improved the algorithm making a new revision number, as these improvements have come out after the last firmware update.

Supposedly they are working on a firmware update to be finished after the K14D firmware is finalized.

Hopefully it will address a number of issues.



I wonder if the 2.2 camera revision also improves VPN?
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, cameras, date, dslr, information, iso800, ist*, k10d, noise, photography, revision
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentax W90 - noise at higher ISOs gubak Pentax Compact Cameras 2 10-22-2010 12:03 PM
Lowering image size to lower ISO noise? jboyde Pentax DSLR Discussion 14 08-11-2010 02:44 PM
GX10 Lower iso1600 noise jamesm007 Pentax DSLR Discussion 1 12-27-2008 12:26 PM
Higher pixel count produces less noise...? roentarre Pentax DSLR Discussion 6 11-18-2008 03:43 PM
K10D update and Model Revision 8.1 Yes /No?? Peter Zack Pentax DSLR Discussion 148 06-20-2008 11:08 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top