Originally posted by trog100 quality control will always be a problem for small companies attempting to ramp up production to meet unexpected demand i think the k10 is fine piece of "engineering" but the "fanboy" denial is very evident.. far more evident than the odd doom sayer..
It's a popular myth that Pentax 'ramped-up". They made about 12000 units in the first month; making the same in month 2, and 3 and 4. That's the base production capability. Not scheduled to
ramp-up until late march '07. They simply don't respond to buyer demand like other companies--never have.
We must be reading entirely different forums; fanboys didn't even appear until after the Askey skewering. Banding issues raged for days until it was noticed that the exposure was fringe or marginal. The flash issue fizzled when it failed to become 'an entire production run'. Doomsayers wildly out-number fanboys
plus hopeful optimists over the merger flap--even before the ink was completely dry on the announcement paperwork.
And in every case the doomsdayers got to the forums first and loudest! Lamenting each 'problem' like the end of days was just around the calander corner into next week.
Originally posted by trog100 if the camera does have the odd problem lets have it pointed out so that pentax can make an even better product is my view..
The problem here is that none of the so-called problems has actually been identified as a problem!!! Certainly not to the extent the doomsdayers have tried to imply.
Originally posted by trog100 its also pretty normal for first production runs to have more problems.. which is why the "wise" hang back a little..
My wife calls this the Windstar effect-we don't care much for Ford automobiles since owning an early production Windstar.
And all I can really say is maybe. In more than half the noted K10d 'problems' careful study of the manual and the camera and photo physics reveals error in user interpretation of capabilities of the camera. Mis-interpretation of sizes, settings, function...