Originally posted by GibbyTheMole Some of those Nikkors were downright incredible. Truth is, they all make great glass, as well as some lenses that aren't as good.
Yes, some Nikkors are superb. I won't willingly relinquish my 35/2 nor 85/2 (modded for PK). I haven't encountered bad Nikkors yet, but I haven't really tried.
Yes, almost all camera- and lens-makers produce some outrageous classics, as well as some steaming turds. Pentax, Nikon, Canon, Minolta-Sony, all are included here.
Quote: Wanna hear something weird? Some of my all time favorite lenses were Olympus Zuikos. Beautiful build quality and some of the best glass I've ever used. Go figure.
Indeed. The Zuikos on my old Pen-FT were crystalline. The OMs I now use (50/1.8, 135/3.5) ain't bad neither. I'm still looking for more OMs, you-betcha.
Quote: I've used Pentax, Minolta, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, Kodak, Yashica, Ricoh, Petri, & Praktica film cameras and they've all given me good results.
My film-days working cameras included Argus, Canon, Graflex, Kodak, Minolta, Nikon, Olympus, and Yashica. My current use-sometimes film cameras include some of the above brands as well as Petri, Pentax, Praktica, Voigtlander, and Zeiss. I've also shot Exakta, Fujica, Mamiya-Sekor, Porst, Ricoh, and probably some others I've forgotten.
The camera is a box upon which to hang lenses. A lens captures images but the photographer must SEE to make those images worthwhile. Anyone who thinks their gear qualifies their photography is a fool.