Originally posted by Marc Sabatella Buying generic disposables is much more expensive in the long run than buying rechargeables, much more hassle from having to change them so often, and much worse for the environment. From being better, it is worse in every possible way imaginable. Although for a flash, the alkalines might perform well enough to make them a decent choice. Depends on how uch you use the flash, I guess. The more you use a device, the sooner you hit the breakeven point at which rechargeabkes become a win. For a DSLR with typical usage, you could expect Eneloops to cheaper within the first 1000 shots or so.
I totally agree, and I certainly wasn't advocating using disposable Alkaline AA batteries to power a DSLR on a regular basis. I only mean that in an emergency you could stick a set in there and get a few dozen shots, that it would be better than nothing.
I will say that is someone using their DSLR somewhat infrequently, there is a case to be made for the Lithium batteries (non-rechargeable) as a power source from an economic point of view (although not necessarily an environmental). The set of Lithium AA batteries that came with my K-x lasted over 2000 shots, and at a cost of about $7-8/set, it's quite possible that someone that only takes several hundred pictures a year might be better off with a set of those as opposed to buying eneloops and a charging system. Once nice thing about those batteries is that they have a shelf life of 15+ years. The obvious downside is that they're not rechargeable.