First a little background:
I'm a Luddite in tech-head clothes. I've been perfectly happy since March using my *istDL much like the venerable K1000, with my old manual lenses. So when the K100D came out, I thought, "Huh, I don't need that fancy-schmancy SR stuff, I've been doing just fine without it. How great can it be, anyway?"
Then my husband traded my DL on me - his buddy wanted a dslr, had some old Pentax lenses, but didn't have the money for a new camera. They agreed that I'd sell him my DL, and get a K100. Luckily I decided this was a reasonable proposal. I got the K100, was too busy to play with it, then got sick, and only just got around to really messing around with it.
Yesterday we trapped a young raccoon. They get in our bird feeders and compost, and have apparently attacked a couple of our cats, so when we get the chance we trap them and relocate them. It was sitting in the back of the vehicle, in not-so-great light, as I took a few shots. I noticed my shutter speed was getting a little low, remembered this fancy-schmancy SR that I'd been pooh-poohing, and turned it on for one final shot. Here are 100% crops of the eye:
On the left, f8, 1/20, SR off. On the right, f8, 1/15, SR on. Both at 55mm at close range.
When I looked at these, well, you coulda knocked me over with a feather. Okay, I'd seen Janneman's Dynamic SR Test over at dpreview (anyone who hasn't, ought to - bloody funny!) but figured that's a nice, regularly jiggling engine, that's easy for the mechanism to cope with. Also, the manual says SR is less effective at short distances - I was within 30 cm of the cage, probably closer.
Sorry to bore all of you who figured this out ages ago with a long-winded story, but it was a bit of a revelation to me! I'm going to have to write "SR!" on my right thumb where I'll see it while shooting, so I'll remember to turn it on when appropriate - it certainly works far better than I'd thought possible.
Julie