Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-07-2012, 08:16 PM   #1
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere, USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 458
Autofocus/metering contrast/comparison between pentax, nikon, and canon systems?

So I'm sure this has been discussed to death, but hey I'm new. I'm curious how the pentax phase detection system works exactly. I'm guessing that reads a beam of light from the pentaprism...or does it pass through the mirror? I'm correct in assuming it is black and white? What is the fstop sensitivity and does it have an fstop equivalent of its own? I understand how phase detection works, I'm just curious to understand how pentax has implemented it. Forgive me if any of these are stupid questions. I'm trying to understand how the metering and autofocus systems really work so I can understand their differences between implementations.

03-07-2012, 10:12 PM   #2
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,913
You could start here, and then search the forums and Google a bit to update what's there.

Also paragraphs are your friend

EDIT: of course one should refer to some of Falconeye's work when discussing Pentax AF, like his paper on the K-5 AF, which has lots of information on the K-5 phase-detection AF system.

Last edited by rawr; 03-07-2012 at 10:21 PM.
03-08-2012, 05:11 AM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere, USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 458
Original Poster
Thank you. I will start there. Also sorry about the lack of paragraphs. Its hard enough just typing this out on my phone.

I can do paragraphs though. Sometimes I forget how long a block of text is as I ramble on.
03-08-2012, 06:25 AM   #4
Inactive Account




Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 202
Real quick - the AF module is in the bottom of the camera; light passes thru a half-silvered part of the main mirror to a sub-mirror behind it and is reflected down into the AF module's optical system which splits the light into sets of 2 images and projects them into different AF detection areas. I.E. the images appear on pairs of line sensor arrays on the AF CCD. These are recently arranged in a 1-3x3-1 grid (the 3x3 are cross-type sensors, the 2 end ones are vertical line-type).

The position of the images along the array(s) are compared to come up with a defocus amount(s). This amount is used to know how much to spin the AF motor, which returns encoder pulses back to the CPU. Various algorithms and monitoring devices are used to determine which sensor area(s) to use, which line sensor in that area, whether there is enough light/contrast, whether the defocus amount will be enough to get lock, etc.

The multizone photo metereing IC is indeed above with the pentaprism, near the eyepiece.

Start with the lumo link as mentioned. Then go to Google Patents. Look up "Pentax AF".

I recommend US Patent 7496290 B2
& US 2006/0104621 A1.


Last edited by jmg257; 03-08-2012 at 07:03 AM.
03-08-2012, 03:50 PM   #5
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Somewhere, USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 458
Original Poster
Wow. I read the k5 af study. Mind blown. It almost makes me want to pass on the k-5. I love my k-7s low light focusing ability. It does fail at a point, but usually when the viewfinder is very dim. It looks like the k-5 is far more erratic in low tungsten light. I'm pretty ok waiting for the k-3 or whatever replaces the k-5. My k-7 is serving my exceptionally well so far and just keeps on taking pictures. Pictures that I rather like.

Edit: I must add that its pretty clear why remving all the complex parts of a slr would be a huge cost savings measure. After seeing how complex the af system actually is, the economies of scale involved with bringing such tech down to say $1000 is mind blowing.
03-08-2012, 04:12 PM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,112
[deleted]

Last edited by beholder3; 08-11-2013 at 06:59 AM. Reason: [deleted]
03-09-2012, 12:50 AM   #7
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,913
QuoteOriginally posted by zosxavius Quote
It almost makes me want to pass on the k-5.
If you are happy with the K-7, and you don't do a lot of low-light/high-ISO, then sure, there may be little reason to think about the K-5 anyhow.

But having used the K-5 for a while now, I don't understand all this talk of low-light focus problems. Whether it be tungsten, dim rainforest floor, or LED stage lighting, K-5 AF works fine for me. The firmware updates seem to be doing good things too in this department. My technique and skills usually fail me well before the camera technology lets me down.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, detection, dslr, fstop, pentax, phase, photography

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 7D vs Pentax K-5: A comparison Adam Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 125 11-21-2011 06:35 AM
Anyone with dual systems (Pentax and Canon/Nikon)? tbirdas Pentax DSLR Discussion 23 11-18-2010 12:11 PM
Equivalent of Pentax primes on Canon and Nikon FF systems dexmus Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 10-01-2010 11:16 PM
Pentax vs Nikon vs Canon - A Lens System Comparison cputeq Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 46 05-20-2010 06:09 PM
Nikon and Pentax - Question on Flash systems comparison VAV Flashes, Lighting, and Studio 9 08-13-2009 07:24 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:04 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top