Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-06-2012, 02:37 AM   #31
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,889

Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.


Are you still trying to use it with your 70-300mm @300mm+macro mode (which causes more extension)? Because that will be too much magnification for most handheld stuff. Try pulling it back to about 200mm, without the macro mode, and you'll be much closer to the usual 1:1 ratio. You'll also get sharper results, as these cheap zooms go soft at the long end quite dramatically.

Also, you'll need to shoot at a much smaller aperture than you would normally. f./16 through f./22 is perfectly normal for this. Diffraction? Maybe a little, but the gain to DoF is worth it.

04-06-2012, 05:42 AM   #32
Inactive Account




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Photos: Albums
Posts: 217
Thanks for the tip. I'll definitely try it. BTW, any thoughts on using tripod plus macro rail/slider? Cheers.
04-06-2012, 05:50 AM   #33
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,889
I've done a bit with tripods, and it's a pain for live subjects. I don't have rails yet, they're still on my list of stuff to buy. Someone else will be able to give you better info on those.
04-06-2012, 06:38 AM   #34
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,965
QuoteOriginally posted by el baroda Quote
Thanks for the tip. I'll definitely try it. BTW, any thoughts on using tripod plus macro rail/slider? Cheers.
inexpensive focusing rails are very useful for macro work on a tripod because it is difficult to make small position adjustments by moving a whole tripod.

04-06-2012, 07:53 AM   #35
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,263
QuoteOriginally posted by el baroda Quote
G'day, mates. I did some more test shots today and found it almost impossible to get a decent photo. The working distance (yes, it's 8") is too short for photographing insects and the depth of field is too shallow.
Welcome to the wonderful world of macro, where all working distances are inconvenient and all DOFs are too thin. Did you bother to freeze your insects first so they wouldn't run away? A focusing rail will help with immobile|dead subjects, and you can work with focus-stacking for thicker DOF.
04-06-2012, 08:07 AM   #36
Inactive Account




Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 2,965
RR said:

Welcome to the wonderful world of macro, where all working distances are inconvenient and all DOFs are too thin.

04-07-2012, 07:07 PM   #37
Inactive Account




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Photos: Albums
Posts: 217
Hi. Here are my first decent 1:1 macros. Pentax K7, Tamron 18-200mm @200mm, Raynox 150, on-board flash. Photos have been resized for easy upload. Thanks for your tips. Furthter comments and suggestions most welcome.

Name:  _IGP0382b.jpg
Views: 1065
Size:  28.1 KB

Name:  _IGP0319a.jpg
Views: 905
Size:  88.1 KB

Name:  _IGP0346a.jpg
Views: 844
Size:  51.9 KB

Name:  _IGP0328a.jpg
Views: 1555
Size:  81.8 KB

Name:  _IGP0325ab.jpg
Views: 874
Size:  125.5 KB

Name:  _IGP0351a.jpg
Views: 923
Size:  59.3 KB

04-08-2012, 12:14 AM   #38
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,889
Good stuff. I like the head-on shot of the butterfly. I'm surprised you're able to use the pop-up flash with a lens that long and not get shadowing.

One thing you might want to consider is a diffuser for it. There are lots of DIY solutions, ranging from paper boxes that sit over it, to a cut clear film canister over the flash itself. I've experimented with these with decent results, but lately I've switched to a commercial one. You can find lots of cheap ones on Ebay, like this, and they work quite well. They're a knockoff of the Gary Fong ones, just $2 instead of $30. This kind works fine, too, but they're a bit more of a hassle to attach. The upside is, they fold flat and fit in a pocket easily. You could also make something very similar, yourself.

I tell ya, I have no idea how the Chinese can sell these things for $2 shipped and make any profit at all. It's nuts.
04-08-2012, 02:13 PM   #39
Inactive Account




Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney
Photos: Albums
Posts: 217
I also used my external flash on bracket but the results were not as consistent as when I was shooting with my Tamron 70-300mm. I can't understand why. Thanks for the tip on the on-board diffuser. Will get one. Happy Easter, mate.
04-09-2012, 09:25 PM   #40
Veteran Member
Culture's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vaasa
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 818
Over the weekend I was trying to take a macro shot. Well I dont know if you can call it that because basically I didnt know what I was doing. I just turned on the switch to the macro side on my tammy and started shooting an insect @ 180mm @ f/8.

Needless to say the fly was very small. what did I leave out?
04-09-2012, 09:28 PM   #41
Veteran Member
Culture's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vaasa
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 818
QuoteOriginally posted by RioRico Quote
Welcome to the wonderful world of macro, where all working distances are inconvenient and all DOFs are too thin. Did you bother to freeze your insects first so they wouldn't run away? A focusing rail will help with immobile|dead subjects, and you can work with focus-stacking for thicker DOF.
This is exactly how I have been think of starting macro photography.

In the dead of winter you can hardly come across any insect.

So you basically have to kill them to shoot them.
04-10-2012, 04:50 AM   #42
Veteran Member
audiobomber's Avatar

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Photos: Albums
Posts: 6,806
QuoteOriginally posted by Culture Quote
Over the weekend I was trying to take a macro shot. Well I dont know if you can call it that because basically I didnt know what I was doing. I just turned on the switch to the macro side on my tammy and started shooting an insect @ 180mm @ f/8.

Needless to say the fly was very small. what did I leave out?
For maximum magnification, you need to set the zoom to 300mm. I would also suggest you forget about auto-focus. Put the camera in manual focus mode and adjust focus to minimum distance. Move your torso back and forth to get the right focal plane. Manual focus is almost universally used for macro shooting.

If you have enough light, or can add light, apertures smaller than f/8 are generally preferred for insects, to get more than the head in focus.

Last edited by audiobomber; 04-10-2012 at 05:16 AM.
04-10-2012, 06:48 AM   #43
Veteran Member
NickLarsson's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Paris, France
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,390
QuoteOriginally posted by RioRico Quote
Did you bother to freeze your insects first so they wouldn't run away?
Hi, sorry for my newbie question but how do you do this ?
04-10-2012, 11:06 AM   #44
Veteran Member
RioRico's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Limbo, California
Posts: 11,263
QuoteOriginally posted by NickLarsson Quote
QuoteOriginally posted by RioRico:
Did you bother to freeze your insects first so they wouldn't run away?
Hi, sorry for my newbie question but how do you do this ?
1) Capture arthropod(s)
2) Place bugs in container
3) Place container in freezer
4) Wait awhile
04-10-2012, 11:16 PM   #45
Veteran Member
Culture's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vaasa
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 818
QuoteOriginally posted by audiobomber Quote
For maximum magnification, you need to set the zoom to 300mm. I would also suggest you forget about auto-focus. Put the camera in manual focus mode and adjust focus to minimum distance. Move your torso back and forth to get the right focal plane. Manual focus is almost universally used for macro shooting.

If you have enough light, or can add light, apertures smaller than f/8 are generally preferred for insects, to get more than the head in focus.
I will try this out and see. But I thought it was best to stay away from the far end of the focal length.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, converter, diopter, dslr, lens, lenses, macro, photography, raynox, tamron

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: Raynox DCR-150 Macro Adapter lens. GaryH Sold Items 2 11-12-2011 10:48 AM
dedicated macro lens vs lens with Raynox or other adapter loco Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 19 06-10-2011 12:36 PM
Raynox macro converter on 50mm lens? ratm4484 Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 5 04-05-2011 04:50 PM
Raynox lens for macro shooting Gary G Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 8 11-19-2010 08:43 AM
For Sale - Sold: Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Lens (Worldwide) ChipB Sold Items 2 10-26-2010 12:21 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top