Originally posted by ElJamoquio I'm only doing your research on lenses for you
?? You didn't tell me anything I didn't already know.
Quote: I'm not going to design a hypothetical camera for you too
I'm not the one who wants this hypothetical (which is to say, non-existent) camera, *You're* the one who imagined it would be possible to assemble an FF system that was smaller than an APS-C system, so it's *you*, not me, that would benefit from this hypothetical (which is to say, non-existent) system.
It comes down to a very simple question: can you or can you not assemble a *real* (not hypothetical) FF system that is equivalent to (in functionality and quality) but smaller than my current APS-C system, which consists of a *real* (not hypothetical) camera and *real* (not hypothetical) lenses?
Answer: you cannot, and presumably you know this or you'd have put up by now.
Quote: Do the math, a crappy lens on a FF camera will give you better sharpness than a great lens on APS-C.
I have a degree in mathematics, and I can absolutely assure you that no mathematics known to mankind will make a false statement true. Although to be fair, I can see how one could possibly incorrectly apply the math to be misled into believing this - extrapolation of LWPH figures and so forth.